this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2024
193 points (90.4% liked)

Movies

7490 readers
539 users here now

Lemmy

Welcome to Movies, a community for discussing movies, film news, box office, and more! We want this to be a place for members to feel safe to discuss and share everything they love about movies and movie related things. Please feel free to take part and help our community grow!


Related Communities:

[email protected] - Discussing books and book-related things.

[email protected] - A place to discuss comic books of all types.

[email protected] - LW's home for all things MCU.


While posting and commenting in this community, you must abide by the Lemmy.World Terms of Service: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

  1. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, or advocating violence will be removed.

  2. Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally insult others.

  3. Spam, self promotion, trolling, and bots are not allowed

  4. Shitposts and memes are allowed until they prove to be a problem.

    Regarding spoilers; Please put "(Spoilers)" in the title of your post if you anticipate spoilers, as we do not currently have a spoiler tag available. If your post contains an image that could be considered a spoiler, please mark the thread as NSFW so the image gets blurred. As far as how long to wait until the post is no longer a spoiler, please just use your best judgement. Everyone has a different idea on this, so we don't want to make any hard limits.

    Please use spoiler tags whenever commenting a spoiler in a non-spoiler thread. Most of the Lemmy clients don't support this but we want to get into the habit as clients will be supporting in the future.

Failure to follow these guidelines will result in your post/comment being removed and/or more severe actions. All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. We ask that the users report any comment or post that violates the rules, and to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Schindler’s List director says in speech marking 30th anniversary of the USC Shoah Foundation that he is alarmed that ‘we may … once again have to fight for the very right to be Jewish’.

In remarks reported by Deadline, Spielberg said: “Those who can not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. I am increasingly alarmed that we may be condemned to repeat history – to once again have to fight for the very right to be Jewish.”

He added: “The echoes of history are unmistakable in our current climate. The rise of extremist views has created a dangerous environment, and radical intolerance leads a society to no longer celebrate differences but instead conspire to demonise those who are different to the point of creating ‘the Other’… This is happening alongside anti-Muslim, Arab, and Sikh discrimination. The creation of ‘the Other’ and the dehumanisation of any group based on their differences, is the foundation of fascism.”

Spielberg also directly addressed the current conflict in Gaza for the first time, saying: “We can rage against the heinous acts committed by the terrorists of October 7th and also decry the killing of innocent women and children in Gaza.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 86 points 7 months ago (3 children)

From the article.

Spielberg also directly addressed the current conflict in Gaza for the first time, saying: “We can rage against the heinous acts committed by the terrorists of October 7th and also decry the killing of innocent women and children in Gaza.”

[–] [email protected] 34 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Also this was interesting:

Spielberg has not signed the open letter criticising Zone of Interest director Jonathan Glazer’s Oscar acceptance speech.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago (2 children)

What was the speak in a nutshell? Calling it genocide

[–] [email protected] 16 points 7 months ago

It was something like they made this movie to reflect atrocities in the past and present, and they refute to be connected to Israel who is committing their acts in the name of all the jewish

[–] triptrapper 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

“We stand here as men who refute their Jewishness and the Holocaust being hijacked by an occupation, which has led to conflict for so many innocent people. Whether the victims of October the 7th in Israel or the ongoing attack on Gaza, all [are] victims of this dehumanization.”

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

To add - the media reported only the part which said "we refute our Jewishness", without the additional context. Hence the controversy.

[–] triptrapper 5 points 7 months ago

Yes, I also think it could have been worded a little more clearly. But definitely not Glazer's fault that he was misrepresented.

[–] Linkerbaan 11 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Nobody signed that letter. It was a change.org petition and one of the names was Riverto Thesea (rivier to the sea)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 7 months ago (1 children)

But can we decry the genocide being committed by Israel or will be try to downplay it with weasel words.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Right. He got close to calling that out without saying the word genocide which it absolutely is. I am truly shocked that in my lifetime I am seeing the same atrocities committed toward the Jewish people, now being committed by them on others. Really a sad underscore of human nature. I guess what goes round comes round.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago

Yeah this is what bothers me the most, and no doubt fuels the 'maybe Hitler was right' tinfoilers. Israel isnt doing the Jewish any favours right now.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Yeah he's right. That first part can be about America or the world at large, not specifically Gaza.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

What first part are you referring too?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

What's in the headline about antisemitism.

[–] Anticorp 2 points 7 months ago

Your comment isn't very clear about what you're trying to say.

[–] fluxion 46 points 7 months ago (1 children)

In remarks reported by Deadline, Spielberg said: “Those who can not remember the past are condemned to repeat it."

I wish people would put a bit more thought into that when they repeat it

[–] [email protected] 43 points 7 months ago (1 children)

@fluxion I agree. I think he has put thought into it. That's why this was worth posting.

The people in here who think he's supporting the genocide unfortunately didn't read past the first paragraph.

[–] drislands 19 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's infuriating. Every top level comment I've seen is showing they can't read more than a few sentences without commenting.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Twitter is wall to wall bots. I wonder how many are on lemmy.

[–] drislands 5 points 7 months ago

Honestly good point.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Much less oversight on Lemmy.

[–] jj4211 2 points 7 months ago

We like to assume thoughtless content must mean bots, but I think real people are plenty likely to read that first paragraph and jump straight in to comments.

[–] TheBat 40 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I don't get why people are surprised about his views. He made Munich, a movie where Israeli government uses bunch of guys to take revenge against Palestinian terrorists.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Munich_(2005_film)#Controversies

[–] [email protected] 21 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Yeah, the actual term was State sponsored extra-judiciary assassinations. Just so we are all on the same page just to call a spade a spade.

[–] cosmicrookie 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

There's a difference between killing Palestinians terrorists and killing Palestinians

[–] TheBat 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

His protagonists were second guessing themselves even when they were killing the terrorists.

I don't understand what is it that you're trying to say here.

[–] cosmicrookie 2 points 7 months ago

I'm just pointing out that what people are mad about, is not them fight against terrorists.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Oh yeah, but what does Ja Rule have to say about this?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago

Oh god, won't somebody please call Ja!

[–] WhyDoYouPersist 19 points 7 months ago

Decry the killing of innocent women and children, but none of the men in the pile were found innocent.

[–] qevlarr 16 points 7 months ago (3 children)

It's easy to condemn antisemitism. Do you condemn Israel?

[–] EncryptKeeper 30 points 7 months ago

Not only did you not read the article, you didn’t even read the summary on the lemmy post.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago

Sounds like he just did

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago

Disappointing language... Describing one as heinous, then following with decry makes the far larger scale atrocities in that conflict come across as a tacked on footnote in his speech. While its essentially a genocide happening as we speak, by the people who claim to lead the people he was speaking about.

Felt like it was going somewhere only to end with weakness.

[–] doublejay1999 2 points 7 months ago
load more comments
view more: next ›