this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2024
149 points (96.9% liked)

News

24641 readers
4435 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlyingSquid 66 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Donald Trump stands to reap a windfall of $3 billion or more

Cool. Who's getting it first, the State of New York, the banks loaning him money, or the Russians who own those banks?

[–] CaptainSpaceman 44 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Lets see him sell $3bn in his stock and it not tumble to zero

[–] [email protected] 19 points 10 months ago

He already put effort into making the shareholders change the rules to allow him unlimited share sales with no warning/notification. Total "fuck all the investors" kinds of rules. I don't know where all that stands, but he's way ahead of you on this pump and dump scheme.

[–] AlbinoPython 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

As someone who knows nothing about the stock market, wouldn't he still get his 3bn and everyone else would be fucked? I assume the price would fall after he sells no?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago

Imagine you own an orange tree, and you want to sell the oranges. If you run out and try to sell oranges, people will low ball you. What you really hope for is people wanting to buy oranges, and you try to sell then as quickly as they ask for then, or a little slower in order to drive the price up per orange due to demand making people offer more.

This is like trump owning x number of oranges, and saying they’re worth a certain amount per orange, so it is worth that amount times x. In reality, he only has shares he can sell, and there is the assumption he can sell them.

[–] CaptainSpaceman 5 points 10 months ago

Stock sales are kinda weird when youre talking about large sales like that, because some will hit the dark pools making them less likely to affect the price.

However, that is usually reserved for institutions, not private sales.

On top of that, youd have to assume that only one sale would occur, and he wouldnt need to piecemeal his transactions by selling blocks of shares instead of the whole lot.

Its really tough to predict, but id like to imagine nobody even wants his POS company.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I would like to believe he still has a league of greedy dogs that are still trying to get him to pay them. They'll make sure he gets paid so they get paid too. I'm really curious as to how some Grima Wormtounge will make that happen for him.

[–] Dkarma 1 points 10 months ago

He'd just borrow against it...not sell

[–] [email protected] 26 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Can someone explain how this fucking works? DWAC market cap is 1.37B, Truth Social has apparently never made money... How does them merging add like 6+ Billion market cap? Am I crazy or has the world gone nuts?

[–] eran_morad 11 points 10 months ago

It’s a scam.

[–] vanontom 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I don't really understand this, either. Other than these new SPACs being the cutting edge of fraud or some kind of white-collar crime. Here's some interesting info (and comparison with Reddit IPO).

SPACs were supposed to be a quick and easy way for a company like Trump Media & Technology Group to go public, but it hasn't worked out that way.

Instead, they've developed a reputation as a kind of back-door IPO for companies that probably couldn't withstand the scrutiny involved with a conventional listing.

Many of the highest-profile SPACs, including Nikola, Virgin Galactic, and BuzzFeed, are now unloved penny stocks.

[–] HurlingDurling -3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Social media platforms may not make money in the traditional sense of sales or monthly purchases, but they harvest users data and that on itself is worth a bunch of money, not to mention having the ability to continually harvest more data.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Selling that data is part of the not making profit. Aka they would need to get much more money for the data or sell a lot more. Advertisements are where most of it come from for most companies

[–] HurlingDurling 1 points 10 months ago

Sure, most social media companies like Facebook might sell users data as anonymous indicators for advertising on their platform, but are you sure that Truth Social isn't just whole selling users data as datasets with uncensored data info to data brokers?

[–] ikidd 11 points 10 months ago

Follow the money.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago

How many crayons do you have to eat to think it's a good idea to do business with tRump?