this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2024
175 points (98.3% liked)

politics

19241 readers
2850 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sen. Bob Menendez cannot escape federal prosecution on grounds that he has legislative immunity from four conspiracy charges alleging that he accepted bribes including cash and gold bars in exchange for delivering favors to three New Jersey businessmen, a judge ruled Thursday.

U.S. District Judge Sidney H. Stein in Manhattan said in a written ruling that charges alleging the New Jersey Democrat accepted bribes from three businessmen in return for legislative favors cannot be dropped on grounds that members of Congress get extra protection from some laws for what they do in the legislative sphere.

He said criminal intent cannot be protected by wording in the Constitution meant to protect information sharing by legislators.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NocturnalMorning 63 points 9 months ago (2 children)

What is it with people and immunity claims these days? That's such a poor legal defense.

[–] givesomefucks 37 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The judge is 78 years old, who knows what dumb shit they'd agree to.

That's how legal defenses work when you can afford lawyers, you try everything possible and see if it sticks.

Even if it doesn't, maybe something is handled wrong and even tho it shouldn't of worked and wasn't going to, you get a mistrial.

The legal system is different when money isn't a factor

[–] MotoAsh 12 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

It really, really shouldn't be, but it's crazy how so many fail to realize that it really is different with money.

[–] givesomefucks 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Not just the legal system, taxes as well.

Any complicated system like that is going to be better for the wealthiest because they can pay experts to go thru it.

An average American would get a public defender or just take the standard deduction on taxes.

[–] billiam0202 8 points 9 months ago

It's more than that- money buys you time. Think of all the services you have to engage with on a daily basis, then realize that if you have enough money, you can pay other people to do those things for you. Groceries? Have someone else get them for you. Clothes? Pay a tailor to fit you. Waiting at the airport? Not if you have a private jet. Break the law? Good luck getting convicted, and even if you do you can still live the big life while you grind away at the years-long appeals process.

Poor people don't stay up all night shit posting on Twitter because they have to go to work the next day. Rich people do rails of ketamine with Joe Rogan then spend all day spreading lies about cannibals from Haiti coming to the US on the social network they overpaid for while desperately seeking the approval and adulation of the population of goddamned morons who believe Fox News.

[–] Num10ck 3 points 9 months ago

money changes everything.

[–] Zachariah 3 points 9 months ago

If you’re clearly guilty, what other choice have you got?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Who does he think bribery laws bind if not legislators?

[–] homesweethomeMrL 13 points 9 months ago

The poors, ducky, the poors

[–] specseaweed 16 points 9 months ago

What a dirtbag.

[–] AllonzeeLV 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I always think people like Santos and Menendez getting in trouble for bribery and fraud is hilarious.

Political PACs make political bribery perfectly legal and the US hates when boring, honest people run for office, they never get anywhere, we demand bullshitters that tell us we're pretty.

Do it to be sure, but why stop at single digit Congress people? There's like 10 between both chambers that aren't on the take.