this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2024
558 points (93.2% liked)

Political Memes

5409 readers
4832 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 93 points 8 months ago (8 children)

Using Steve Harvey for this is an interesting choice...

[–] endhits 8 points 8 months ago

It's just a meme

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] rockSlayer 43 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

Use this moment. Keep leading them on, and then when the moment is right say "that's why I'm an anarchist"

[–] TheBat 40 points 8 months ago (1 children)

And they hit back with, "I'm a sovereign citizen too!"

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago
[–] jeffw 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

“Anarcho-capitalist, right?”

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago

"That depends, is capitalism still intrinsically hierarchical?"

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago (2 children)

legit question not for any argumentative reason but also when/if you respond I may also have a response that pushes back. No harm tho.

When it comes to being an anarchist what do you actually imagine the end game being? I also agree the powers that be are shit. But anarchy in my mind will lead to small collectives of people like feudal socialism or something.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago

Anarchists are rarely the "no government" people the media portrays them as. Generally it's an understanding that hierarchy is inharently bad, though still sometimes required. From there it can go any number of directions.

[–] rockSlayer 8 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I appreciate you want to understand. For a bit more research for yourself, I'm actually an anarcho-syndicalist. I'm also pretty unique even within that ideology, fwiw. What I imagine is a socialist library economy, in which the librarians are elected and the library is the primary method of distributing goods. The librarians are also responsible for managing and automating work and food production. I imagine a solarpunk society where communities are mostly self sustaining but also interdependent. I imagine a world that has no need for money.

I also imagine that unions represent both their communities and the workers within the community and that all managers within workplaces are elected. When the many various dealings happen between communities, I imagine something similar to haudenosaunee council meetings. Each community sends a proportional bargaining committee of their population, and the largest communities must reach consensus between and with each other before being decided on by and between consensus from the smaller communities. Tentative agreements must then be voted and ratified through simple majority by all communities to be considered participants in the contracts. I'm sure people will say "that's too slow". To that I say, you've never seen how quick a union can turn around an emergency meeting.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Come join us at slrpnk.net, you'll find like-minded people there interested in prefiguring such systems.

[–] Godric 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Very interesting, thank you for the write-up! Out of curiosity, how does a moneyless society work?

Just I do you solids, you do me solids? How does a moneyless society allow trade if one party doesn't have any goods the other party wants?

[–] rockSlayer 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That's what the library is for! Instead of buying things, you borrow from the community library. When you no longer need to use that thing, you return it to the library. If you need to own something, you get it from the library or you can make it/privately trade for it. As much labor as possible is automated, while the people performing labor do it out of passion and at their own pace, with the goods being manufactured for the library to distribute. Some of the automated manufacturing and 3d printed custom designs can be onsite and available to the public.

[–] Godric 1 points 8 months ago

Interesting! It's a cool concept for sure

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

There's many different types of moneyless economies. Just gonna spitball a couple ancient ones at you.

In a gift economy, individuals will create things and share them amongst the the community. These gifts just keep being given over and over, and not reciprocating a gift eventually leads to poor standing.

In a community stockpile, everyone works together to collect what others need. A group essentially tracks the stockpiling and helps determine how the stockpile should be used, such as in times of low yield.

My understanding is that Marx believed that there'd eventually be a day when people would essentially do group-makes for whatever they needed or wanted. Basically no money or anything - one guy would go "I want this", he and others would volunteer, they'd all work together to design a fabrication process, and then would all make as many of the thing as there were those who wanted it. A completely volunteer process.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey 14 points 8 months ago

Remove your hand from my shoulder before I remove it from your wrist.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago

“⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️” five star meme

*—Peter Travers *

[–] bigFab 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

This happened in Germany in the early forties...

[–] menemen 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Not really. It was more that conservatives thought they could controll the far right and made appeasement their main doctrine.

The left (that was a lot more left than nowadays) was always against the Nazis.

Edit: and that was in the mid 30s.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I might be too ignorant to put this in the proper context, but what do you make of the so-called Beefsteak Nazis (i.e. leftists who joined the Nazis)? Not to say the Nazis were in any way authentically leftist, but they did use leftist rhetoric (see Strasserism) to get left-wing, working class support.

[–] menemen 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

First time I hear that term, it is not used in German. Yeah, there was a minority wing in the NSDAP who had some socialists views. The NSDAP was not a monolithic group, unlike many might believe. They also had a lot of esoteric people. Edit: all of them were fascists though, not communists nor liberals.

But they are not the ones who brought Hitler to power. That was Paul von Hindenburg, Franz von Papen, a group of industrialists (Industrielleneingabe) and, of course, the people, that voted for him.

It is all pretty well documented.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Yeah, I wouldn't imagine the communists and socialists brought Hitler to power, lol - though it sounds like I need to educate myself more. Do you have any primer you would recommend on this topic?

load more comments
view more: next ›