this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2024
1092 points (96.9% liked)

Microblog Memes

4727 readers
2560 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.

Related communities:

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 153 points 4 months ago (7 children)

Problem with Avatar adaptations is that even a really good one will be bad in context of a series that has 100% rating (99% audience score!) on Rotten Tomatoes.
You simply cannot improve on perfection.

[–] Windex007 169 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I think the main problem is that they keep inviting the original creators, they sign on, the studio heads explain to the creators how the studio has figured out how to tweak things, creators say "your ideas are horrible and if you execute on them as you've described, everyone is going to hate it". The studio's refuse to budge, creators depart citing creative differences, studio gets their way. Is a steaming pile of shit. Rinse and repeat.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

I heard the reason they left this time was because the showrunners wanted to basically recreate the series, and the original creators were like, “but.. we already made that series. Let’s make something new”.

Could be false though, because I don’t understand how they’d get so attached to the project knowing that it was supposed to be a live action remake from the start…

[–] Supervivens 31 points 4 months ago (1 children)

So basically, show runners wanted to make Scott pilgrim vs the world while the OGs wanted to make Scott pilgrim takes off

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 months ago

Haha yeah exactly! Maybe that’s why they got attached originally. Perhaps they thought they could redo parts they were unhappy with or show new perspectives and storylines.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] KingBoo 23 points 4 months ago

This is the lifecycle of live action.

[–] FireTower 48 points 4 months ago

That and most come at it with the standpoint of animation is for kids rather than recognizing animation as simply a medium.

If they just took the original series and drew an extra frame between each frame I wouldn't be surprised if it made more than any of the live action works.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] teft 141 points 4 months ago (3 children)

The only adaptation I will accept is one where Dwayne Johnson is playing Toph.

All others are inferior.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 4 months ago

Unacceptable, he has to play The Boulder.

[–] TropicalDingdong 23 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This and only this is acceptable, but they should still be voiced by the original voice actors.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Daft_ish 133 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (9 children)

I hate how Hollywood thinks live action is the highest form of visual media. Like you want remake avatar? Up the budget for animators, pay the shit out of your voice actors, and pay some writers to add some darker themes. Would be better than any of the live action have been.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 4 months ago (2 children)

The original is pretty dark for a childrens show. Even as an adult episodes like the one about blood bending made me shiver a bit.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Yeah but they weren't allowed to show or too directly imply death. That's why Jet's "death" scene was bizarrely vague. Getting rid of that restriction on the original writers would probably be interesting.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 69 points 4 months ago

But the Fantastic Four had a great movie called "The Incredibles".

[–] [email protected] 68 points 4 months ago (4 children)

The Netflix show wasn't bad. It just wasn't better than the original.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 4 months ago

It had some really rough moments intertwined with some really well done moments. Overall it's fine. The shots of the cities and some of the fights were beautiful. I also really liked some of the zuko and iroh backstory that wasn't in the original show. Some of the dialogue was very clunky and they mashed up a bunch of stories into the same episode which felt weird and didn't totally work. I enjoyed watching it for the most part. It was never going to be as good as the original so I think going in with that expectation helped.

[–] Stoney_Logica1 27 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Which isn't really possible so I don't know why they keep investing money into trying. Just make more animated shows set in that universe.

[–] drivepiler 20 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Well.. Paramount, which owns Nickelodeon, allows Netflix to make an adaptation and makes a fat check off the IP. They don't really lose any money either way. The good news is that they've given the creators of Avatar their own studio now and tons of new animation projects are in the works.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I loved it. And I was (am) a fan of the animated show. I think the adaptation was creative, approachable, and overall excellent. Fans forget that there's a big potential audience that isn't interested in watching a cartoon, just the fact that it's live action gives so many more people an opportunity to see this world.

First episode was shit though

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bonesy91 64 points 4 months ago (2 children)

This adaption, while not perfect due to nothing coming close to the show in terms of perfection, is not bad at all. It's shorter than the show so of course they had to make things flow quicker and things were cut out. But for a 7 episode take on season 1 I was impressed.

[–] Spaceballstheusername 22 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Im only 4 episodes in so I can't give a full review but I think the problem is there were some choices that were made that ruined the heart of what was good about the show. Uncle iroh and saka are not funny at all. I just saw the 4th episode which has the caves of omashu and the singing hippies were hilarious but got mostly removed. It's like they think laughing would cheapen then shows seriousness or something. There is no love connection between aang and katara. And they added a bunch of storyline from season 2 for some reason.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah it's not the best thing since sliced bread, but it was a decent TV show (in a vacuum.) Which was about the best we could hope for when they said they want to appeal to Avatar fans AND Game of Thrones fans.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I just don't get it. Who wants a live action avatar. The show holds up just fine.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Twoafros 62 points 4 months ago (9 children)

I like that in the netflix version they added scenes that weren't in the original. My favorite is the scene of Lu Ten's funeral. Iroh is just sitting there silent but you can see on his face that is he is broken inside but everyone comes up to him and congratulates him that his son died a hero. No one says it but for me it felt like in the fire nation culture you're not allowed to mourn the death of those who died in battle, which is a crazy concepts but fits with the Fire Nations fascist ideology.

I couldn't find the whole scene, but here is the last part of it (https://yewtu.be/watch?v=hwPn2gJ1B_U). For context, Zuko has gone up to Iroh and said that Lu Ten's death is great honor. But when he was about to leave he comes back and thats when the above video starts.

These scenes add so much to the character of Iroh, Zuko, Lu Ten (whose character we did know anything about in the original) and to war-time Fire Nation culture. It's amazing!

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] mlg 53 points 4 months ago (2 children)

For a fraction of the cost, Netflix could have instead just frame remastered the original show into 16:9 (not lazy cropping) and spent most of the effort into marketing it properly to gain a much wider audience.

But that would involve talent, critical thinking, and accepting that animation is a format not a genre. So naturally they just bought the rights so they could have their version of Star Wars/Harry Potter.

I could go on an entire rant about how even thinking making an animated show into a live action is a stupid idea, no matter how much money you throw at it, but I think I'll just wait for E;R's 2 hour youtube special instead lmao.

[–] Katana314 17 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Has this ever been done? Taken an entire TV series animated in 4:3, and just adding content to the sides of the screen on every single frame?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (4 children)

God I hope they never try that.

The best visual artists are extremely effective in their use of space. A 4:3 image expanded to 16:9 would just look weird, as the framing would simply not look right.

The alternative is some amount of expansion and cropping but it would still not look nearly as good as leaving the artwork in it's original aspect ratio.

A great example is Seinfeld which looks frickin terrible in 16:9:

https://consequence.net/2021/10/seinfeld-aspect-ratio-netflix/

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 37 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That play was pretty solid though, I'd watch it live.

[–] ceenote 25 points 4 months ago

HONORRRRRRrrrr

[–] [email protected] 35 points 4 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (9 children)

It's not bad. Stop perpetrating this clickbait.

Edit: I was wrong y'all. It's trash

[–] OneOrTheOtherDontAskMe 16 points 4 months ago (22 children)

I watched an episode. It's really bad. I rewatched the series this last year so I could compare it. Just because someone agrees with the popular sentiment doesn't mean they're perpetrating (perpetuating?) click bait.

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] RGB3x3 16 points 4 months ago (3 children)

It is though and I've watched the entire thing. Dialogue lines are trash, they constantly "tell" instead of "show," timelines don't make any sense, Team Avatar has no Chemistry, Katara learns to waterbend at a master-level from a single scroll, Aang never waterbends, there's no obvious through-line for the plot (it's just assumed you know why Aang is going to these places), Aang literally has no passion, and the show is trying to straddle the line between shot-for-shot remake and a retelling, but failing at both. There's ZERO character development. I could go on with things that are wrong with this new series.

I think the young actors and the special-effects crew have been failed by the writers, directors, and producers.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 4 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 4 months ago

Haha as a German I am lucky and can just switch to the German synchro. The voice acting is directly 300% better... Still that leaves the bad visual acting... As a bonus I get the old voices though. Somehow they where able to get the original voice actors for katara, sokka, suko, azula, Ty lee, Zhao, jet (I think), and suki

[–] [email protected] 26 points 4 months ago (35 children)

Is it bad? It’s bad isn’t it. I bet it’s bad.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 4 months ago (5 children)

It's not bad, it's certainly enjoyable.

My take: the original is the real story. The Netflix is a summary. They skip a lot, but it's only 8 episodes. The things they skip, I just remember "still happened". The things they merged/combined are just part of the summary.

You are able to like the Netflix, as long as you know it's not a replacement. Just enjoy the retelling, and seeing Uncle iroh as a real person!

[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

It's only eight episodes, but they're an hour each, so it has exactly the same runtime. Also, the cartoon has the Great Divide, so not adapting that should have given them another 24 whole minutes to work with

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

All I needed to see was a clip of Aang saying, out loud, in the first episode, "but I'm just a kid who likes playing games and eating food and hanging out with my friends! I can't fight the fire nation!" Like. The Netflix show has exactly the same runtime as the first season of the anime. There is no reason why they couldn't have just shown us Aang being a kid and hanging out with his friends instead of telling us, unless they only wanted to save that runtime for flashy CGI fight scenes.

That and instead of Katara opening the series with her famous "water, earth, fire, air" monologue, the show has their grandma recite it word for word directly to Aang's face

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (33 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 months ago

"Did Jet just die?!*

"It's not clear."

[–] ooterness 19 points 4 months ago

Ember Island Players is my favorite episode. It's such a good capstone.

[–] stufkes 18 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I enjoyed Netflix' Avatar so much that I finally started the anime. The acting from basically all the children actors is atrocious but I just love the realism and animation of the worldbuilding that an anime just can't give me. Any plot points with minor characters are great and with the exception of Azula, the fire nation actors are great.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Slight difference between a tongue-in-cheek self-aware parody of your own creation, and an earnest and serious attempt at an adaptation that falls flat...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›