An open, user owned community for the general disscussion of the libertarian philosophy.
Most people live their own lives by that code of ethics. Libertarians believe that that code should be applied consistently, even to the actions of governments, which should be restricted to protecting people from violations of their rights. Governments should not use their powers to censor speech, conscript the young, prohibit voluntary exchanges, steal or “redistribute” property, or interfere in the lives of individuals who are otherwise minding their own business.
Source: https://www.libertarianism.org/essays/what-is-libertarianism
1. Stay on topic
We are a libertarian community. There are no restrictions regarding different stances on the political spectrum, but all posts should be related to the philosophy of libertarianism.
2. Be polite to others and respects each others opinions.
Be polite to others and respects each others opinions. We don't want any form of gatekeeping or circlejerk culture here.
3. Stay constructive and informational
In general, all types of contributions are allowed, but the relevance to this community must always be evident and presented openly by the contributor. Posts that do not meet these requirements will be removed after a public warning. Also remember to cite you sources!
4. Use self-moderation measures first before reporting.
This community is fundamentally built upon freedom of speech. Since everyone understands libertarianism differently and we do not want to exclude any kind of content a priori, we appeal to the individual users to block/mute posts or users who do not meet their requirements. Please bear this in mind when filing a report
I'm a leftist, not a libertarian, but I always feel compelled to bring up a specific point in Snowden's defense when he is mentioned to divisive opinions:
He did speak up correctly, using the correct channels, and the proper channels told him to shut the fuck up.
Then he again did what he did the rightest way he could, by giving the data to one of the oldest members of the fourth estate, the press, to decide proper course, ONLY AFTER the primary state failed him spectacularly.
Do you know why he had to out himself? Why didn't he give stuff to the papers and stay hidden?
They were state secrets with a very well documented list of individuals to which it had been disclosed and he was documented as having had taken issue with the program. It's reasonable that it would be traced back to him and that he would not be given protections or a fair trial.
This work survey is anonymous and won't be associated with any identifying information. Feel free to voice your authentic opinions.
Proceeds to login via OKTA to access survey.
"I don't feel strongly about anything" if it's required, deleted email if it's not
At work, you keep your opinions to yourself.
It doesn't matter if you are asked for your opinion by your boss, in an "anonymous" survey, or by a co-worker at a seemingly innocuous kids birthday party. There are no friends in business. Stick to business. Anything you say can and will be used against you.
I'm not a very political person. I don't have strong feelings about it sir. Taking care of business is my priority.
Stay safe out there folks.
He revealed massive warrantless domestic surveillance. The 1700s equivalent would be if the post office made copies of every single letter everyone sent and then promised not to read them unless the sender or recipient was one day subject to a valid warrant. Whoever revealed this info would've been a hero and a patriot back then, and it should be the same today.
Snowden leaked his info about these programs more than a decade ago. If that is what the three-letter agencies and big tech were capable of doing in secret then, just imagine the shady shit they're doing now.
Watching us via the front camera while we poop?
If that is what the three-letter agencies and big tech were capable of doing in secret then, just imagine the shady shit they’re doing now.
It's publicly available information that almost all social media companies have all of your private posts and the ability to release them to anyone they desire. People just don't care.
Instead of arguing about the guy why don't people simply focus on what he leaked?
his persecution is the distraction from the crimes he exposed.
They tell us he endangered our operatives, yet not one example has surfaced in over a decade. You know they would be shouting that shit from every rooftop if it happened.
This is how the USA treats heroes. We persecute them for exposing our evil.
What's funny about this picture is Obama was seeking his extradition for the leaks. I'd still vote for him again though.
It's a contious effort to distract from the leaks. Same tactic was used for Chelsea Manning and Julian Assange.
This guy is the definition of a modern day hero. If you haven't read his book "permenant record", get on it
I have nothing but respect for Edward Snowden.
IDK what this has to do with Libertarianism, but I agree with the meme
Free speech isn't exclusive to libertarianism but it is truly a core value of that philosophy
"No, we mean stuff about the bad guys. Not us."
#FreeSnowden
“Not like that…”
For EU citizens: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32019L1937
The states shall provide a secure and anonymous channel to enabling safe whistleblowing. A software for this is globaleaks.org
A state should provide a channel to anonymously blow the whistle. Then, this information is forwarded to the correct authorities.
This sounds awesome, but what authorities exactly are the correct ones? What happens when I want to report THE authorities?
No not like that
Luckily he was able to escape Russia safely. If he stayed in the US he would've been tortured just like Chelsea Manning and Assange.