this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2024
245 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

59408 readers
3386 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Minnesota burglars are using Wi-Fi jammers to disable home security systems::undefined

top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 73 points 9 months ago (3 children)

If it is running over Wi-Fi it isn't really security, it is a toy. At the very best a visual deterrent for opportunistic people.

[–] givesomefucks 47 points 9 months ago (2 children)

So is all the locks on your door...

You can have a metal door with 3 deadbolts and a cast iron storm door also padlocked.

Still takes a small rock to break a window.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 9 months ago (2 children)

"So are all"

And yes I agree, if people want to get in they are going to get in but a lot of people buying these cameras some how think they are suddenly immune to crime.

[–] QuarterSwede 11 points 9 months ago

Devils advocate: A masked figure who walked to my property and stole my stuff doesn’t solve who did it. If someone doesn’t want to get caught, there are always ways to prevent it.

Note: I don’t think people think they’re immune but they may not realize wifi can be jammed. Wired is better than wireless but sometimes wireless is the only way or only way to provide a camera to a certain spot that wouldn’t be covered otherwise. And then there’s renting where wired mods to the home/property may not be permitted. There are some use cases that make sense.

[–] Quetzalcutlass 13 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

one of my favorite scenes

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] GeneralEmergency 16 points 9 months ago (1 children)

At the very best a visual deterrent for opportunistic people.

That's what all security is though.

[–] RGB3x3 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

No security system is going to prevent someone from just kicking in your door and stealing your shit in 2 minutes, then leaving.

But it's great for insurance purposes and tracking down people after they leave. And if your door or window is opened during the middle of the night, an alarm system is going to be fantastic for alerting you to someone in your house.

WiFi security systems perform their function of deterrence, monitoring, and insurance claims just fine.

[–] sebinspace -4 points 9 months ago

Wow, I haven’t seen a more head-ass take since Linus last opened his mouth..

[–] snekerpimp 39 points 9 months ago (2 children)

So setting everything up wired with PoE was a pain, but worth it.

[–] saroh 16 points 9 months ago

This, but don't forget to plug the router to a UPS!

[–] a4ng3l 9 points 9 months ago

A pain and obviously I wish to never have a use for the recordings….

[–] sharkwellington 27 points 9 months ago (2 children)

They can't do that, it's illegal!

[–] cmoney 17 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Can't we make crime illegal already?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Maybe not in Minnesota??

[–] AdamEatsAss 6 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I guess if you're going to break the law anyway what's one more lawbreak. But I thought the FCC actively tracked down people using illegal frequency devices?

[–] bassomitron 18 points 9 months ago

thought the FCC actively tracked down people using illegal frequency devices?

It depends on the frequency being deployed. Shit operating in the ~2/~5 ghz spectrum doesn't travel far at all, so unless an FCC agent is directly nearby when they're doing this, it's not going to be detected by them.

However, if you're illegally blasting in the <1k mhz spectrum, that does travel far and more importantly it interferes with common bands used by public safety, air traffic controllers, DoD, etc (ATC is around 100mhz, public safety typically around 800mhz, DoD around 300mhz (although this varies)). That interference will definitely start being noticed and it's a matter of time before you're caught.

[–] Magister 6 points 9 months ago

I'm pretty sure those jammers (they saturate wifi band with trafic) are used only for burglary time, say 10-15 minutes, and very local, so the neighbour million$ mansion is far enough that they are not affected. How come FCC detect this?

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The FCC knows where my microwave is?

[–] AdamEatsAss 4 points 9 months ago

You bet they do. They have trackers in every microwave sold. That's how they track Taylor Swift to influence the Russians. -s

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

"Minnesota"? Everyone, c'mon

[–] einlander 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Don't many of the wifi cameras include local recording to SD cards?

[–] bassomitron 5 points 9 months ago

Sure, but I wager many folks go with the easiest route and just rely on cloud storage or possibly local central storage.

Regardless, hardwire is best for any "critical" system to avoid shit like this. I've been telling my family for years that once common criminals adapted to the times, people with wireless everything smart homes were going to be in for a world of hurt. My reason being that the vast majority of IoT type crap are notoriously riddled with easily exploitable vulnerabilities. WiFi jamming isn't anything new or even complex, but it's just the tip of the iceberg of what's to come for low tier criminals, IMO. We truly are entering the early stages of the cyberpunk era, but without all the cool cyberware implants (yet).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

They may not care about being filmed, so much as being able to call the cops while they're in the middle of robbing you.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The article stated that they are watching the homes and going in when no one is home in order to avoid any confrontation.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Exactly. They are trying to avoid confrontation, so they don't want people seeing someone on their security camera and calling the cops.

If you get an alert that there's motion in your living room, you may check and would call the cops if you see something. If you get an alert that your camera is disconnected you quietly curse your ISP and continue about your day.