Ils mignons les gars mais j’ai un doute que la victime typique soit le genre a lire des tweets ou des articles dans la presse, voir meme des notifications dans les apps des banques.
Et pour avoir un etre humain avec qui echanger ds sa propre banque c’est devenu une dinguerie.
Perso je suis en faveur de leur faire partager la responsabilité vu qu’ils ne sont plus en mesure d’éduquer / conseiller les clients faibles.
I can understand being fine with a nomination that aligns with his personal interests but from there the journey to « party of small people » likely takes a convoluted path.
Depends on the jurisdiction and the case specifics. In europe, under GDPR the consequence we (my employer) are the most terrified about is an injunction to stop any further processing of given data for a purpose that would be deemed illegitimate.
You’re not coming back from that one…
And that would typically be on top of the fine which would be to some extent « cost of doing business » indeed.
I have to tackle the last floor from insulation / electrical / heating to finish.
Then find how to get the whole documentation for the new electrical installation since the initial company that did most of the work went under do that I can have it surveyed. And 4 more windows openings to re-finish since the walls are now ~20cm wider.
And then 2025 should be the year we do our exteriors :)
They have safari which uses their own engine which makes it competition to the whole disfunctional chrome family and firefox. This is about search engine, not web browser though…
Same same, I’ve seen way too many vids of bridges letting go in flood for crossing anything remotely similar…
It’s not a bad altar for one’s faith. The contractors that actually built it though…
Sounds very US… I had to take some info on the topic here in europe and it appears that there’s a very much unalienable right for kids (and next of kin) to a fair distribution.
One can literally not change the part of the patrimony going to a child (without resorting to very complex arrangements that seemingly won’t be accepted by a judge should shit hits the fan).
Even though, for example, one learns he did not father a child -still cannot change the percentage. Tough luck for the other children, the wife…
Everyone has a right to be protected here. In the grand scheme of things it’s for the best.
And yeah, ethics is the basis for this simply you have to assume the position of the weakest one involved and not from the perspective of the one with the money ;-)
Like with all emerging technologies let’s wait for jurisprudence on those… though in europe we generally frown upon anything firearms I guess there will be some interesting evolutions with drones.
As platforms they open too many possibilities and a rather constraining framework is already preventing their operation unless you have a license… which could become more of an access barrier if abuses become more prevalent.
Anecdotally I have seen first hand in 2 occasions unlicensed operators getting caught and largely fined; which was in the end more expensive that having the little drone shot.
Anyway having references that broadly seem to offer protection to drone operators isn’t necessarily a good news even where gun maniacs aren’t plentiful.
You’re not fucking Gandalf, stop answering questions by more questions.
Good to know and very unfortunate that it’s labelled as such by op… sooooo in the end we don’t care about TFA?
Well it’s been quick to start the limitation of options… not their first rodeo it seems.