this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2024
554 points (85.7% liked)

memes

8656 readers
2579 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BB69 114 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Oh this is about Israel. I thought it was about Ukraine and I was very confused

[–] [email protected] 32 points 5 months ago (27 children)

i still suspect those conflicts are related. i can 100% picture some FSB guy helping hamas attack or bribing Bibi to create a humanitarian crisis, so western attention, funding and weapons gets drawn away from Ukraine. This is some shit they would pull in desperation.

[–] BB69 34 points 5 months ago

Well, I mean, Hamas is funded by Iran. Iran and Russia are good buddies. So…

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (4 children)

It only makes sense. Russia financing start of another conflict that takes attention away from Ukraine and has 110% certainty of making Jews (Zelenskyy) look bad because of the batshit cracy fascist Israeli government, and USA look bad because their history in middle east and they'd probably get involved directly in some way again (happening right now). Oh also Hamas attacked on Putin's birthday or some shit

Call me conspiracy theorist but it seems so damn obvious

[–] Eldritch 7 points 5 months ago

Conspiracy theory doesn't mean false or crazy. Some conspiracies are crazy/false. But not all. There is a way to generally pick out the bat shit theories pretty quickly though. The more people that are required to maintain a conspiracy, the less likely it is to be a thing.

So for conservatives where they insist that the world is conspiring against them and that they aren't just assholes. They're just assholes. In the case of Russia and China running foreign influence operations. We have evidence they do. We know America does. And we know ML or people generally from .ml domains are generally just anti American hypocrites eager to play along just to bash America.

That said, if they are doing this. And they are. Pelosi just gave them plenty more ammunition. The United States is making a lot of unforced errors when it comes to Israel. All we had to do was step back for a little bit and act cautious.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I saw a video of an Israel official on RT blaming Russia and vowing revenge. I also saw some analysis that some of the weapons Hamas had were from North Korea and Russia would've had to have helped get the weapons there. There is all kinds of disinformation going on about the Israel war, so I take everything with a grain of salt.

Calling for a stop to an ethnic cleansing campaign is not pro Russia. If anything, Israel's behavior has greatly increased the threat of harm to its civilians, and its image on the world stage may never recover. Same for the U.S. ever trying to claim moral superiority.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

If I was living in Gaza right now, I’d be transforming myself into a human revenge machine. Even if nobody I knew personally had been killed. Just seeing my neighbors being slaughtered, I’d be quietly and coldly calculating.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (24 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 53 points 5 months ago (7 children)

I've said it before: Every Democrat I know in real life seems like an empathetic person, so it's astonishing they choose these ghouls to represent them.

[–] [email protected] 87 points 5 months ago (2 children)

My running theory from observing from across the Atlantic is that participating in American politics is mentally destructive. You are confronted by two frankly terrible options, so you either accept you live in an undemocratic country or you have to convince yourself that one of the parties is actually good. No matter what choice you make, it breaks something in you.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Maybe this is what leads to so much cultlike behavior and unquestioned loyalty to one party or the other. And if you're anywhere outside these parties, or you so much as criticize a sitting politician, then you're hated from all sides and accused of being a Russian bot, which is especially disappointing when you're someone who does hold your nose and vote blue, but that's not good enough -- you have to fully toe the line, or else it's perceived as interfering with a campaign, a campaign which never ends.

We're not really a democracy, are we?

[–] ShibaInuTheDoge 19 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago

#WashingtonWasRight

#ButAlsoHeWasKindOfAnAssInOtherWays

#ButRightAboutThis

Also, I love your username. I have two shiba inu.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

See the thing is for the most part the only people who question the loyalty is Democrats who only choose Democrats because the other choices more terrible and then the Republicans are in questioning because they're filled with hate and propaganda.

Yes, I know you could say the same about Democrats but that's not what studies show. Sorry about your feelings. (Not to the person I'm replying to specifically, but anyone who takes offense)

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Democrats who only choose Democrats because the other choices more terrible

Literally me, and it's super hard to do this when I have family and loved ones being detained or deported by a system that Democrats uphold, and neighbors suffering from lack of access to healthcare. Imagine seeing and experiencing all this and then being told that voting's not enough -- that we also can't complain about it, lest we be dismissed as "Russian bots" or "Chinese shills." Imagine never seeing certain people again, and then being told that I'm the one who's privileged because I have the audacity to complain about it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

and then being told that I'm the one who's privileged because I have the audacity to complain about it.

Yeah and I tell them and I'm using my privilege to protect those without. Exactly what people with privilege are supposed to do.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago

You nailed it

[–] Viking_Hippie 16 points 5 months ago (4 children)

That's because Congress has been piss-poor at being representative of the people.

It's usually not about who shares the policy positions of the electorate as much as who can scrape together enough money to buy enough ads to convince them that they're the one most likely to beat the other team.

That's how Pelosi became Speaker in the first place in spite of having no legislative accomplishments to speak of nor seniority: she was simply the best at collecting fat checks from rich people and their corporations.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Our "democracy" does this by design. Looking at history, it's hard to believe we can ever fix this.

[–] Viking_Hippie 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yeah I know. All the rules are written and being written by the already rich and powerful. Based on the world's oldest national constitution still in use.

Who would have thought that perpetually basing society on the opinions of a bunch of slave owning WASPs would lead to inequality ‽

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

And then we're supposed to feel enthused about voting for the candidate who's gracious enough to harm fewer marginalized groups, rather than feeling perpetually depressed and miserable about the whole situation, which seems like a normal reaction.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago

the good ol' lesser of two evils.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (2 children)

You dont really get a choice on who the party chooses to prop up and runs. See, Bernie Sanders. But, hell, I've seen it ag the grass roots level in my state. The people with the power in the party decide who goes on the ballot.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

It's really not very democratic, in the strict sense of the term

It's exclusionary by design

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

They're convinced that they don't have a choice.

[–] darthelmet 5 points 5 months ago (4 children)

In my experience they appear to be until you bring up some issues, then they turn into bloodthirsty monsters.

For example, my my goes completely Ooga booga genocidal when Isreal is brought up.

Or on housing: She won’t even entertain any solutions that don’t let landlords keep exploiting people’s basic need for homes. She gets all “why should they have to give up property? They worked for it! Shouldn’t they be able to make money?” She can’t possibly empathize enough to value the basic needs of most people over the right for people who already own more than they need to profit off of others who have less than they need.

Honestly, I think most of them just don’t like the aesthetic of the Republican Party more than they’re actually opposed to conservative politics.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] db2 4 points 5 months ago (7 children)

A prerequisite for being a politician is also being a narcissistic sociopath. The few that aren't/weren't are the deviation from that, and usually get hamstrung if not just killed anyway.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Jeffries is toeing the same line.

There is a huge generational divide in the democratic party between those who benefit from the US police state and those who are suffering from it.

This seems to map very cleanly onto whether people support the Gaza genocide.

[–] Agent641 3 points 5 months ago

Jim Jeffries? I knew that cunt was up to no good!

[–] Rubezahl 14 points 5 months ago (13 children)

What has she done?

What ceasefire? Which one, of the numerous conflicts now on Earth, is referred to here?

[–] [email protected] 32 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Pretty sure it’s in reference to this past weekend she got approached by someone demanding a ceasefire, and Pelosi’s response was for that person to go back to China because they are also genociding Uygurs. She later claimed she thought the reporter was a Russian plant or some unhinged bs.

So, not even the usual ceasefire bad because right to defend. Just ceasefire bad because whataboutism.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

The news source of "menzmag" is reporting about her freak out on the pro Palestinian protesters on her driveway this weekend.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 5 months ago

Pelosi said that pro-Palestine protestors should be investigated by the FBI for ties with Russia

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Tronn4 10 points 5 months ago

Meanwhile does more shady stock trades while everyone is looking the other way

[–] dasgoat 6 points 5 months ago

She told activists to 'Go back to China where your headquarters is' which uh. Is interesting to say the least.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

Let’s hope the trial is handled swiftly before the The Hague invasion act is activated.

load more comments
view more: next ›