The problem isn't the NSA being able to buy the data without warrant. The problem is companies being allowed to collect and sell that data to begin with.
this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2024
238 points (98.4% liked)
News
23299 readers
3439 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Exactly, the way the NSA is buying the data is no different from Facebook. Only way to stop it is for consumers to have ownership of their own data.
With laws the way they are right now, companies can leverage access to data for providing a “free” service and you sign your rights to ownership of the data by default when using their services (terms of service).
Yea.
We knew that.
Same way the FBI is prohibited from collecting DNA, but theres nothing illegal about them buying 23andMe's databases.
Presumably it would be illegal for them to hack in....although let's be honest they still might have done it.
But where's the need if they can buy an individual's genetic markers for pennies?
Budget cuts
it's probably far less expensive to pay companies for data, rather than maintain a hacking thing that may or may not break into where you're targeting data.
Yeah but only one of those can be paid for with seized crypto assets.
Tracking everyone: American Companies 🤝 American Government
Americans 😐
why would you need a warrant to purchase something?
That's not the point. If they wanted to acquire the data themselves they would need a warrant. What the article is saying is that data brokers collect data on people sensitive enough that if the police were doing it without a warrant it would be a crime. If your neighbour collected this data on you it would be stalking. But companies can stalk your online and sell their data to others including the police for profit.
I'm surprised they buy it instead of just collecting it by default.
Buying it is the exact reason they can afford not requesting a warrant.
The logic chain is as follows:
- You wilfully pay for services and content with your data (you don't pay with cash, and you keep using services that you know use your data instead)
- Those services do use the data as advertised (for advertisements, too)
- Anyone can then buy the data. Your data. It is by design, and you agreed to it.
- The NSA is among "anyone". They absolutely have the right to buy the data that you sold for services. The irony in their case, is that they are using your own money, that they got though taxes, for that.
They would not have the right to get that data otherwise. And for the most part, they probably wouldn't get it (the amount of data generated by the surveillance capitalism is properly staggering and mind-blowing). But you sold it, and it's fair game, so they might as well buy it with a tiny fraction of your taxes, right?
They probably collect it by default, and use that to figure out what data they need to buy in order to be able to claim it came from the data broker instead of their top secret collection source.
probably cheaper to pay for the data directly than to have to invest in engineers + infra + storage + people with the skills required to attempt to break/circumvent any layers of security.
the NSA should be abolished
Good news is they have to buy it