this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2024
208 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

58369 readers
5212 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SGG 71 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's simple. Either you are one of the few enterprise customers they want to keep (of which there are only a handful), or you need to have started a transition away from VMware the moment the purchase was announced.

Which completely sucks for the industry.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Who are the customers they want? I know of companies in the fortune 100 moving away. They don't want me to name then so I won't.

[–] SGG 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

No idea which customers they are specifically, my comment was based on this article, which is basically acting as a summary of some of the Broadcom investors day presentations: https://www.theregister.com/2022/05/30/broadcom_strategy_vmware_customer_impact/

It's not so much that they don't want the rest of the customers to stay with VMware, its more so a disregard for them moving forward.

[–] test113 4 points 8 months ago

I mean, if I were an investor looking at this, I would also get excited about making this change - much less risk, less cost, less customer support, etc., all for basically the same output in revenue. In other words, if I cut the small business (6% of value but over 100k accounts to handle) out of the model, I can make more money because the cost reduction is higher than the loss of revenue. And in the long run, when "big game customers" jump ship, I just downsize some more. I also don't need to invest but can be sure it will generate a certain amount of revenue, as long as I do not squeeze the relevant customer groups too hard. This strategy is very feasible and relatively risk-free. I am not a fan of it, but I think a lot of software companies will go this way after they establish themselves in a market.

[–] linearchaos 30 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

DYAM I dodged a bullet. My VMWare renewal came due in December but we pulled the rip cord and went to Proxmox because the renewal was more than the price of the VMHost machine and the licenses for all the VMs running on it.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago

We did the same thing. Been VMWare customer for over 12yr and slowly migrating to Proxmox. So far pretty happy with it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

Proxmox is awesome. Debian underneath means you can do whatever you want. And the tools in proxmox are pretty damn good especially with automation scripts.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 8 months ago

I've already dumped my esxi servers and am using proxmox and hyper-vm instead.

That's one less customer for them.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 8 months ago (1 children)

We're trialing migrating windows workload to hyperv. We pay for windows licenses anyways so hyperv is free, and it's come a long way. Veeam supports it, so keeps the change minimal.

[–] ikidd 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Well, it could only get better because when I tried to deploy it widely about a decade ago it was an utter steaming pile of shit. I went and got my VCP instead.

[–] WordBox 1 points 8 months ago

2008 was pretty shit. 2012 was pretty good. And now 2016+ has a lot more features.

The best and worst part about it is that it's Windows.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


It's unclear who or how many current partners will be able to sell VMware-related offerings after April 2024, leaving potential for tens of thousands of businesses to be disrupted.

But today’s news reportedly reveals a final closure date for the cloud services provider partner program, which debuted in 2019.

The Register noted “unconfirmed fears” that only 10 percent of the biggest VMware cloud service providers would be invited into Broadcom's partner program.

VMware has about 4,000 service provider partners, according to a January 4 report from CRN, which claimed that only 10–15 percent of them are expected to get invites into the Broadcom program, citing an unnamed source.

By altering how VMware tech is purchased, long-term customers may be forced to change critical infrastructure or work with a new, potentially much bigger, provider than they're used to.

There’s a deeper concern that Broadcom’s VMware won't prioritize smaller customers during this evolution.


The original article contains 544 words, the summary contains 151 words. Saved 72%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

Really enjoying XCP-ng so far. A steep learning curve, but worth climbing imo.

[–] Tikiporch 3 points 8 months ago

Thank fuck, maybe we can get away from VMware MDM.

[–] deafboy 2 points 8 months ago

Just finishing the migration from cloudstack to vcloud director.

I'm not angry, just disapointed.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago