this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2024
371 points (96.7% liked)

News

23656 readers
2764 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Fidelity has again marked down the value of its shares in X Holdings, which the mutual fund giant helped Elon Musk buy for $44 billion when the company was known as Twitter.

By the numbers: Fidelity believes that X is worth 71.5% less than at the time of purchase, according to a new disclosure that runs through the end of November 2023 (Fidelity revalues private shares on a one-month lag).

all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dugmeup 73 points 1 year ago

Super genius Musk

[–] [email protected] 63 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

when the company was known as Twitter

It’s still known as twitter

Fun fact: 𝕏 is actually a Unicode symbol, so musk can’t trademark it

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 year ago (2 children)

𝕏 is actually a Unicode symbol, so musk can’t trademark it

That's not true, it absolutely can be a trademark. You might be thinking of copyright - he can't copyright the current 𝕏 logo.

The rights you'd get from each protection are different and a sensible business probably would want both. Trademark protection would prevent another tech company trading as 𝕏; copyright protection for the logo would let you set terms on how it is used.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 11 months ago (2 children)

So in this case, I cannot open a company called 𝕏 that uses social media to share elons flights, but I could open a company called Elon Tracker and use the logo 𝕏?

[–] foggy 15 points 11 months ago

Yes, but if Elon opened a fledgling company to track himself with 𝕏 money, he'd have a great arguement to take the name from you and do nothing with it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

No, those are both trademarks, you're associating 𝕏 with your tech business (to the extent that Elon Tracker is a tech business).

But if you start a plumbing business you can call it 𝕏, because trademarks are industry-specific.

You might be able to get away with starting a business called XYZ and putting 𝕏 symbols all over your website as long as it obviously isn't your logo.

Or you can publish images of people doing unspeakable things with the 𝕏 logo. As long as you are not claiming to be 𝕏, you can use the 𝕏 glyph however you like.

This is not true of the bird logo. You aren't by default allowed to reproduce it, so the company can allow you to, with extra conditions of their choosing. They can make you take down images of people doing unspeakable things with the bird logo, on the basis that it contravenes their terms and therefore is not covered by the license.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

You might be thinking of copyright

Yea I probably am

[–] ozmot 46 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Quick Mr.Musk, before they realize your an imbecile, find some new piece of vaporware to hype up to your stans.

[–] pigup 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

"we dug our own grave with Twitter"

[–] dragontamer 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure he said "We dug our own grave with Cybertruck", not Twitter.

I think he said that "Earth will know Advertisers are to blame for Twitter's downfall", or something to that effect. You know, the more ridiculous quote.

[–] pigup 2 points 11 months ago

That's correct, I was harkening esteemed musk critic Thunderf00t, who purposely changes the quote depending on the specific subject of his videos.

[–] Potatos_are_not_friends 35 points 1 year ago

I always made a joke where I said Elon would immediately call the CEO or whatever a pedo.

But the last Elon Meltdown, he did call them a pedo in under 9 hours.

Let's see how long it takes!

[–] yesman 32 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Xtwitter is obviously a dumpster fire, but it's Tesla that's going to disintegrate the most wealth. Does anybody really think that company is worth more than the GDP of Taiwan?

[–] Sanity_in_Moderation 13 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The cyber truck is an ugly joke. But the stock will hold up until there is another stylish and popular alternative.

[–] Earthwormjim91 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Uh, the Rivian and F-150 Lightning started deliveries years before the cyber truck. Both sell like crazy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yes but neither company has a competitor to the Model S, Y, or 3, which I believe are far and away the most popular models. Until there is legit competition in that space, Tesla will probably remain stable. More companies are getting there but it's been very slow going.

[–] dragontamer 3 points 11 months ago

Mach-e much?

[–] TenderfootGungi 5 points 11 months ago

Have you seen the cheaper cars BYD is building?

https://motowheeler.com/us/electric-cars/byd/

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I mean, I don't even understand why Fidelity felt the need to join the buyout. I guess they own a lot of meta stock so figure they'll make up the stupidity induced losses?

[–] CustodialTeapot 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Are you aware Meta stock is one of the best big tech performing stocks this year with 200% growth after the COVID bubble crash, and is just under 5% off it's ATH?

It's almost like professional businesses know what they're doing (most the time) and random Lemming/redditors know actual jack shit.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I don't think you understood my comment. I was implying that they owned enough meta stock that sinking Twitter would be a net zero situation for them if meta picked up the slack by taking twitters market share. They actually own so much they might even make a profit.

[–] Illuminostro 2 points 11 months ago

#fuckyourdividends

[–] dragontamer 1 points 11 months ago

IIRC, Fidelity already owned a bunch of shares and managed to just hold onto them through the buyout.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 11 months ago

I delighted in being able to show this headline to guests last night after we'd riffed on what an idiot Lonnie was a couple hours earlier. Lonnie-boy just keeps delivering. When he fucks up his fortune and lives in shame and disgrace I'll be happy. Until then, I don't want to hear about his every dumb post. But news of his company's failure can continue. Please proceed.

[–] RizzRustbolt 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I will give him a 2 dollar bill and half a chicken wing for it.

[–] FlyingSquid 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Don't give up your valuable half a chicken wing for something stupid and pointless like Twitter.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

There's still plenty meat on that bone.You take this home, throw it in a pot, add some broth, a potato... baby you got a stew going!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

i think his brain interface already works, and he already had them installed in the heads of everyone who backed that deal