this post was submitted on 04 May 2024
737 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

59119 readers
4322 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NeoNachtwaechter 111 points 6 months ago (5 children)

A Tesla engineer said the test was done wrong because the frunk increases in pressure every time.

"You are holding it wrong!" 🤣

[–] EdibleFriend 71 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Of course it just keeps hitting harder when things are in the way.

Literally Tesla's response

[–] cley_faye 19 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I'm sure these "engineers" were confused everytime they saw an elevator door not mercilessly crush people.

[–] barsquid 11 points 6 months ago

This breakthrough technology could finally provide a way to teach people on the MTA not to hold the doors.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Nope, but they probably know that an elevator doors and a car lid are two completely different thing with different use cases and security concerns.

[–] cley_faye 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

They sure did not know about the "not crushing human limbs" part.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Obviously.

But let's face it: if the car lid would never close if something is in the way, some other dumb youtuber would have made a video about it and here there would be a discussion about how stupid are the engineers to not let the lid close even if a bag in slightly on on the way and the user know what they are doing.

[–] cley_faye 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You're missing the point of a safety feature. The car shouldn't, by itself, close the lid if something's in the way. It should allow the user to push it down, or disable it temporarily, to do so.

The point of a safety feature in any system is to prevent unexpected situation from having unexpected consequences, not to be a magic solution that accommodate for brainless people. In one direction, you can make the judgement call and force the thing down, in the other direction you lose a finger.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

You’re missing the point of a safety feature. The car shouldn’t, by itself, close the lid if something’s in the way. It should allow the user to push it down, or disable it temporarily, to do so.

I get the safety feature. The point is that here I am saying to the car to close the lid even if something is in the way. I made a conscious decision to do so, and more than one time, so I expect the car to do it. But I agree that it could have been designed in a better way.

The point of a safety feature in any system is to prevent unexpected situation from having unexpected consequences, not to be a magic solution that accommodate for brainless people. In one direction, you can make the judgement call and force the thing down, in the other direction you lose a finger.

Which is exactly what happened here. He made the judgement call to ignore the safety feature (and probably ignored how the feature works)

[–] TheBat 14 points 6 months ago (1 children)

They learnt about consent from Elon.

[–] andros_rex 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Probably “graduated college” the same way as Elon too

[–] barsquid 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It that point why not just have some blades slide out on the third try?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Why bother when the door itself is an effective guillotine?

[–] NeoNachtwaechter 3 points 6 months ago

The vehicles deny reality, same as their creator...

[–] [email protected] 44 points 6 months ago (1 children)

He did the test wrong because he's experimenting with "safety" algorithms that the manufacturer has provided little-to-no documentation on and is having to come up with answers on his own. Maybe he wouldn't be "doing it wrong" if Tesla hadn't over-engineered every aspect of their piece of shit truck in the first place. This thing is a solution in search of a problem, and it'll chop your fingers off until it finds it.

[–] NeoNachtwaechter 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

This thing is a solution in search of a problem

Most general question, what is the main purpose of this car? Why should people buy it?

It is a tank.

Steel walls for rich guys who want to protect their asses from masses of poor people around.

What should the door of your tank do if you want to close it, but some bonehead does not move his fingers out, repeatedly?

Now hurry, finally! This rich guy wants to get away from here! BAM!!

[–] ozymandias117 40 points 6 months ago (2 children)

If it increases in pressure every time, I’m now curious how many times you need to close the trunk to cut a finger off

[–] [email protected] 23 points 6 months ago

That was very nearly my exact same thought. Maybe not for curious children with carrot-sized fingers, but for adults, how convenient! Business competitor's body won't quite fit in your fancy frunk? Just while away on your phone for about 10 minutes, let the cat do its magic, and off go the legs! Travel-sized!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I wonder if you can get the frunk to critical velocity at the touch of a fly by constantly pumping it up like a pump action gun.

[–] NeoNachtwaechter 1 points 6 months ago

Escape velocity? 😉

[–] slaacaa 32 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

He forgot to turn on Finger Safe Mode™️ before closing the trunk

[–] filister 13 points 6 months ago

But this feature requires an extra monthly subscription, that wasn't included with the package of the YouTubers

[–] zombieshotgun 10 points 6 months ago

Well to be fair, that functionality is a pretty pricey add-on.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

They're gonna add this in and call it "Jeremy mode", just like the existing Joe Mode

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

That's why Apple gave up on designing a car. All of the potential customer base has already been captured by Tesla.