this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2024
762 points (98.6% liked)

Greentext

4105 readers
1849 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 81 points 5 months ago (7 children)

To be fair, brutalist buildings are fugly

[–] [email protected] 59 points 5 months ago (4 children)

I dunno, I think they're kinda ... neat, I guess? Like, yeah, they're technically pretty ugly, but somehow in a way that makes them interesting.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (5 children)

Trying....and failing, to think of a good portmanteau of interesting and ugly.

Edit: intugly? Ugteresting?

[–] [email protected] 22 points 5 months ago (1 children)

“Striking” is usually the word. It can be used for bad looks as well as good.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Well, as with all my attempts to shine...this has crashed and burned. And not even gloriously....

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Hey, there’s no reason to not come up with new words. You could bring the world the next ‘yeet’ or ‘bussy’.

Just imagine the possibilities!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

Naw...my heart's not in it any more....

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I actually just tried looking that up, to see if such a word actually exists in English. I found a stack exchange thread asking this same question but no one had a suitable answer. So, yeah, I guess it's up to you to contribute to society by inventing and popularizing this new word. Enjoy your new destiny.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago

puts big boy pants on, and refills coffe My time to shine!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago
[–] Feathercrown 3 points 5 months ago
[–] blanketswithsmallpox 1 points 5 months ago

KAKT.

No rounded letters. Sounds gross but kinda like cracked.

KAKT.

[–] SlopppyEngineer 8 points 5 months ago

That would make the cybertruck a brutalist car.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

I guess this is technically the opposite of what you are trying to convey, but your comment reminded me of a song I haven’t thought about in a decade

https://theendlessbummer.bandcamp.com/track/boring-but-beautiful

[–] [email protected] 57 points 5 months ago (2 children)

To you.

The peak of brutality architecture beats any other type in my eyes. It's beautiful in a way no other building or style compares.

[–] Jesus_666 34 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Unfortunately many brutalistic buildings are far off from its peak and just look like lazily designed gray blobs. High-effort brutalism can look good (or can look inappropriately evil but that's besides the point); low-effort brutalism always looks cheap.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Cheap brutalism can look good.

[–] DogWater 4 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Can you share examples of good and bad brutality buildings that are cheap? I'm just curious what you like

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yes but I'm currently traveling and have very limited Internet access... I'll try and remember to do this in a couple weeks when I'm back into good connectivity.

Plus being home will let me pull out my Big Book of Brutalism to reference.

[–] DogWater 1 points 5 months ago

No sweat, I was jw

[–] gmtom 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

For good brutalised, look at the Barbican or Habitat 67

[–] DogWater 2 points 5 months ago

That habitat 67 building is crazy looking!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

They look depressing and I hate being around them. A city should be a nice place to live, not a playground for architects' experiments

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I love being around them. Visiting Tokyo right now and there are so many gorgeous concrete buildings.

The last thing I'd want is to live in a city that was so stuck in the past that all buildings look 100 years old.

Give me buildings from the 2020s not the 1920s. Give me sleek and light concrete, metal and glass.

Death to brick and wrought iron.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

Huh…my preferences are literally the opposite of yours. History FTW!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Damn. I rather like the interwar style of architecture: pretty lines and compelling nuances and decorations. Something to distract myself with as opposed to brutalist architecture.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago

Brutalism is beautiful in its simplicity and honesty. Combine that with some green and it's a 10/10 to me.

Give me a verdant bunker any day.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

A city should be a place for people to live, not some artsy space for real-estate developers to inflate living costs.

Have your artsy architecture projects, but also have functional buildings too please

[–] [email protected] 31 points 5 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 48 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I think the greenery in these pictures is doing quite a bit of lifting. Brutalist buildings without plants are less fun to look at

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago

I think that was the original idea for brutalist buildings, complementing them with plants? I don't want to look for a source right now though, so take it with a grain of salt.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

Any building without plants is less fun to look at

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Brutalism without greenery does not work well in general. I love the post apocalyptic vibes of a concrete building overgrown by plants.

[–] steeznson 15 points 5 months ago (1 children)

These look like defensive structures from a war movie with some plants on them

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod 2 points 5 months ago

I've been looking for a reason why I find them unpleasant and you found it for me. They look like the decaying Nazi bunkers I got to explore on a Danish beach when I was a kid.

Though I also don't like massive towers of glass. Or rowhomes. Or really cities in general. Give me a nice cave in a swamp any day.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

This reminds me of a very short but very good documentary

The Barbican: A Middle Class Council Estate

I was watching this and thinking, almost. How did a country start building like this, for the people and then stop. Then it is all apparent, the Witch got in power.

It appears the growth of these "for the benefit of people" views were replaced with the old ages of the greatest and silent generation, and replaced with the "me, me, me. My money" of the boomer generation.

I can't help but thinking how things could have been different if we continued on from the old timers. I know ww2 destroyed an economy that was lucky to survive it, that's in itself is also an interesting thing to think how the world would have been without it.

[–] grue 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

the Witch got in power

Not British and haven't watched the video you linked, so I'm guessing... Thatcher?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

Yea. He didn't actually mention her just said the conservatives got in power and sold the country.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

I like them...

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

It’s the perfect architecture for any of the non-squishy government organizations like the FBI or the Department of Urban Works.

You, oh lowly peasant should be intimidated in the halls of governance, for you don’t belong here.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Idk man, they've kind of grown on me