this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
972 points (97.7% liked)

politics

19244 readers
2396 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 97 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I just realised how much MTG related coverage there was on Reddit.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

@currychaos

For a minute I was scratching my head wondering how I missed all the Magic the Gathering coverage when I barely saw any 🤣

[–] Octavio 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Reminds me of the time I spent in 2020 wondering why all the right wingers were so mad at the Bureau of Land Management.

[–] FlyingSquid 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] galloog1 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The western land issue is one of the chief things that makes them popular out west. There's more federal land than private and state combined.

[–] JudgeHolden 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Their sense of entitlement when it comes to public lands is unreal.

[–] galloog1 1 points 1 year ago

If someone else owns more of your state than your own citizens, do you really have a state? It's easy for us to pontificate in states where there's hardly any federal land and the issue is reversed. There needs to be more federal land in the East where ecosystems mean more and less in the West.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA 2 points 1 year ago

it's like the british empire is sundowning or something

[–] IonAddis 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It sure would be nice if any MTG mention is promptly spammed by Magic the Gathering content and buried. I don't even play MTG and I'd prefer to have my feed taken over by it! Fuck yeah, nerds--get your game on!

(Disclosure: I am indeed a nerd, too.)

[–] Taokan 4 points 1 year ago

20 years ago, I might have agreed (even if naively). Today, MTG has just turned into a cashgrab. The original game bought and bought again through acquisitions, and rare/mythic rare cards becoming the staple for competitive play driving constructed deck costs into the hundreds (sometimes thousands) of dollars. Between this and the attempted reversal of their sibling D&D's licensing structure (particularly for content creators), I just have no more interest in participating in collecting or playing MTG. I'm nostalgic for the days we used to have big multiway matches (even predating EDH/commander) in between rounds of chess tournaments, or at the school lunch tables, but those days are never coming back. Everything about their design structure now is about extracting maximum profit from their playerbase. Arena offers one of the best CCG game clients one could ask for, but again, the design takes all the P2W gimmicks perfected over the last 2 decades: the gacha, the battle pass, the daily rewards the demand you return to play imbalanced matches again and again and again, essentially becoming the content, the dopamine hit for someone else that paid to win.

[–] PloKoon 4 points 1 year ago

How do you do, fellow nerd?

[–] MegaUltraChicken 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They did find the One Ring card from their new LOTR set recently. Some shop is paying $2 million euros for it. I desperately hope someone throws it into a volcano a la Mount Doom.

[–] a_large_rock 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Gabu 4 points 1 year ago

After all, why shouldn't I keep it?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

It's ok. When MTG news first started popping up on Reddit, I was wondering why everyone hated Magic the Gathering

[–] zeppo 30 points 1 year ago

She makes herself and republicans look bad, but still it’s wrong to give someone like her so much publicity. It’s like how CNN etc pumped up Trump by talking about him constantly in 2015.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I noticed a BUNCH of news and politics lemmy subs were created recently, and spamming depressing shit here like they did on reddit. Like, fuck off I don’t want to see that shit!

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Politics is hard to balance. Hearing about it is depressing, but not keeping up with it feels wildly irresponsible and a big reason why things are so bad.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's important to keep in mind your circles of control, influence, and concern in mind when reading political news. By all means keep yourself informed, but you have to pick and choose which stories you become personally invested in. Otherwise you'll burn yourself out emotionally in no time.

[–] Finnbot 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Exactly - my mental health has been so much better since leaving Reddit. I noticed that I’m not “doon scrolling” as much on here, and I’m back to looking at shit that interests me instead of being bombarded by depressing shit constantly.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Reddit's political communities were getting downright obsessive about "political celebrities" and I hope Lemmy doesn't follow the same path - this post doesn't bode well for that hope.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA 2 points 1 year ago

hmmm. I would like to choose for our political celebrity, um... Thurlow Weed

[–] TehWorld 4 points 1 year ago

Agreed in principle, but implementation is practically impossible except for one's own level. A lot of people yearn for more and some people need less. There is little in our lives that affect us more than politics, and to that end I'm one that really wants to know more, and hopes that we see more news posted here in the Fediverse.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Yup. I don’t want to outright ban all of them, but I don’t want to see so many instances of the same story, or too many of them inbetween something positive. It sucks

[–] IonAddis 11 points 1 year ago

I'm pretty block-happy with communities and users. If they're being dumb...bye.

I have a vague hope that if others are too, those things will wither, because the people here are rejecting it on sight.

...I might be naively optimistic, though.

[–] Methylman 2 points 1 year ago

Sex and outrage are big sellers