this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2024
201 points (94.7% liked)

196

16714 readers
2601 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Real talk, “pasteurize” is the stupidest most misaligned word that could have possibly been used for the process of sterilizing via heat.

[–] [email protected] 65 points 11 months ago (2 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Pasteur

It's named after the inventor of the process though. Heat things to kill bacteria.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

Oh that makes sense

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

Oh that makes sense

[–] mkwt 30 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It should be "Pasteurize", as it's named after Louis Pasteur. And the specific process he invented dramatically increases the shelf life of milk using very high temperatures for a very short time.... Without changing the milk texture or cooking it very much.

So pasteurization is a process that sterilises did with heat. But I don't think it works on meat.

[–] renrenPDX 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It works just fine meat. The graph is often presented in the context of sous vide cooking of meats.

[–] mkwt 0 points 11 months ago

Yes. But that is cooking the meat, as in changing the taste and texture by denaturing proteins.

Pasteurized milk does not get cooked in the same manner.

[–] Francisco 14 points 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Pasteurized products are not sterile.

Sterilization should only be used to describe processes that leave no living microorganisms or fruitable spores behind.