Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected]
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected].
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
view the rest of the comments
Michael Shanks disagrees with calling the penis gun a good weapon.
I love Daniel Jackson but Michael Shanks is such a d-bag in basically every interview (and there are some very questionable "behind the scenes" stories about him...). In that clip he somehow manages to be the most obnoxious Comic Book Guy fan ever.. while being on the stage.
The 1-2-3 is REAL stupid, no arguments there. Well, specifically, the "3 shots disintegrates" is. The 1-2 is not. Killing someone with a "less than lethal" weapon is just reality. And you can potentially get some real awesome moments when Teal'c or Ronon show how much of a beast they are by tanking multiple zat shots before succumbing.
But also... the 3 is incredibly useful from a narrative perspective and is the same reason that Starfleet uses phasers. Having one prop that can fulfill multiple roles and act as a "get out of plot hole free" card (as mentioned with hiding the bodies) is incredibly useful narratively.
All that said: I do love that the Tau'ri were very clearly about "more dakka". Insert meme about Starfleet being afraid to intervene with other cultures and Stargate wanting to get their Nic Cage on.
Episode 200 of SG1 is calling.