this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2024
386 points (82.1% liked)

196

17237 readers
2763 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Bristlecone 65 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Centrist bullshit, the right loves this kind of shit

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Useful idiots. They'll celebrate getting one over on the 'shitlibs' if Trump gets into office, because all they care about is having a Great Satan to oppose without having to worry about thinking too much. Who cares about many minorities will die in the process?

[–] federatingIsTooHard 6 points 1 year ago

Who cares about many minorities will die in the process?

lemmy is suffering from a lack of self awareness. I don't know how to fix it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not really. Most who hold this view are far left.

[–] TotallynotJessica 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It's still a stupid view based on frustration with the establishment rather than reality. Emotions being valid doesn't make a falsehood more correct. Republicans have never been worse and Democrats are better than they've been in decades.

The only coherent argument behind not voting for Biden is accelerationism. It's a morally bankrupt strategy that's unlikely to work, but at least it's a long term plan that thinks beyond cutting off your nose to spite your face.

[–] pedalmore 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How is accelerationism a "long term plan that thinks beyond cutting off your nose to spite your face"? There's no long term plan at all, it's simply a false hope that people will rise up when things get shitty enough, and from those ashes some kind of utopia will sprout. That's not a plan at all, that's just a dream.

[–] TotallynotJessica 2 points 1 year ago

It's a shitty strategy that's divorced from reality, but it does recognize the outcome of not electing Biden. Ignorant leftists on here purposefully ignore the results of their decision so they can feel justified. They want Biden to get what he deserves, but ignore the results of their actions.

It's ironic, because socialism is often associated with utilitarianism and consequentialism, yet these keyboard socialists valorize ignoring consequences.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

>The only coherent argument behind not voting for Biden is accelerationism.

wrong. he's a bad guy who has a bad history and bad policies. that's a very good reason not to vote for him.

EDIT:

this user is making shit up and insulting anyone who points it out. if you ignore them, they might go away.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

biden is one of the most progressive presidents weve had in modern history. your criticism is with congress

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

no, my criticism is with the architect of the crime bill and the usa patriot act. my criticism is with a self-proclaimed zionist. my problem is with the head of a corrupt political party. my criticisim is with biden.

[–] TotallynotJessica 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The hidden part of this argument is that either Trump isn't significantly worse than Biden, or that you don't need to vote for the lesser of two evils in the presidential election. You can't divorce voting for Biden from the context of Republican fascists who are openly Nazis. It's the same shit Israel does with the October 7th massacre: focusing only on the terribleness of the attack and downplaying the decades of oppression that allowed it to happen. It's frustrating as fuck to hear that willful ignorance of the uncomfortable reality, either from Judeo-fascists about their genocide or so called leftists about political apathy.

Voting for a tiny party can work in systems with proportional representation, but that system doesn't even exist for our legislature. The presidency fundamentally can't have proportional representation, as we elect for a single position. Even if we added ranked choice, it will always come down to two dominant choices. That's the trade off of directly electing our head of state.

You have valid frustration, but don't have solid reasoning. Punishing Biden will make things much worse for everyone. Just like I can't punish apathetic nematodes like you for the injustice they cause, you can't punish Biden for his bad behavior. There is only making things better. Righting the past is impossible.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

>you can’t punish Biden for his bad behavior. There is only making things better. Righting the past is impossible.

there is no way to get from this to the conclusion that one ought to vote for him

[–] TotallynotJessica 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Utilitarianism and consequentialism. It used to be a given amongst socialists, but not anymore I guess. You are obligated to perform the action that ensures the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people. Voting for the lesser evil is exactly that. An imperfect action, but a necessary one.

Honestly, socialists should always vote unless they have a specific strategy in not voting. Maybe they're boycotting a rigged election to diminish its ability to justify the government. Maybe it's because a specific deal with a party was broken and they're following through on a promise. With those examples, not voting is combined with a specific action to weaken the government. There's careful thought and the efftect of the boycott is maximized. This isn't the case right now. The only proposed strategy is accelerationism.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

>Utilitarianism and consequentialism. It used to be a given amongst socialists

citation-fucking-needed

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

>so called leftists

anarchism opposes governance

communism is a stateless society

voting for a president at all indicates someone is not a leftist (Fabian socialists being an exception).

if I'm not going to vote for a genocidal tool of the police state, that only bolsters my leftist credibility.

[–] TotallynotJessica 3 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Lol. Leftist is when no vote. Leftism is when political irrelevance. If you're not engaging in the state's political system and not preparing for violence, you're mostly just larping.

A smart leftist would hedge their bets and use electoral politics to garner popularity, organize workers movements, and train in self defense, using all those avenues for power in whatever way works best given the context. The anti voting attitude hasn't worked at growing leftism for decades, while Bernie Sanders and DSA sponsored candidates have boosted the left more anything.

Organizations aren't enough. Fascists only speak violence, so leftists stand no chance against the state. Fascists don't even stand a chance if they lose enough internal support. The state's systems must be engaged with because it has a strong monopoly on violence. No amount of workers unions can oppose an army. Your own logic doesn't even support your approach.

Growing power is necessary to change the world. Might does not make right, but might is necessary to succeed. Viewing liberal democracy as insufficient isn't the same as it being inherently immoral to use. Your leftist credibility isn't worth shit when you have no power to back it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

>The anti voting attitude hasn’t worked at growing leftism for decades, while Bernie Sanders and DSA sponsored candidates have boosted the left more anything.

what is the objective measure you can use to prove this? the amount of money sent to israel? the number of people in prison?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

>The state’s systems must be engaged with because it has a strong monopoly on violence.

wrong

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

>A smart leftist would hedge their bets and use electoral politics to garner popularity, organize workers movements, and train in self defense, using all those avenues for power in whatever way works best given the context.

anyone who doesn't follow your Plan (TM) isn't smart.

this is just ad hominem

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

>Lol. Leftist is when no vote. Leftism is when political irrelevance.

this is a strawman

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

>Growing power is necessary to change the world.

this does not entail voting for joe biden.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

>Your leftist credibility isn’t worth shit when you have no power to back it.

you're the one obsessed with leftist credibility. i just don't want to vote for someone who is going to further fascism.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

>No amount of workers unions can oppose an army.

wrong

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

>Fascists don’t even stand a chance if they lose enough internal support.

i don't know what the fuck this even means. can you cite it? is there some evidence for it?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

>Your own logic doesn’t even support your approach.

wrong.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

>Punishing Biden

I couldn't do that with any vote

[–] TotallynotJessica 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I guess I assumed you had reasoning along these lines to justify your apathy. You probably didn't even think that deeply about it. Malding about Biden takes too much brain power apparently.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

your characterization of "malding" indicates that this is more about performing than discussing. I don't tolerate insults, so i guess we are done.

[–] TotallynotJessica 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

don't tell me what to do

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

you should apologize for your insults

[–] Daft_ish 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think this meme is real light criticism of democrats. Like a dusting of critisim.

[–] TotallynotJessica 3 points 1 year ago

I don't care about making Dems look bad. They're evil in their own way. I care about pretending Republicans are comparably evil. Republicans are on a completely different level. They're orders of magnitude worse. Fascists are much worse than liberals, not because liberals aren't evil, but because fascists are indescribably more evil.

[–] Mango 0 points 1 year ago

You're gonna tell me my 3rd party vote is a vote for Trump. Trump is gonna call it a vote for Biden. Fuck you both. My vote isn't for you.