this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2023
306 points (95.3% liked)

science

14992 readers
539 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

With more of us looking for alternatives to eating animals, new research has found a surprising environmentally friendly source of protein -- algae.

The University of Exeter study has been published in The Journal of Nutrition and is the first of its kind to demonstrate that the ingestion of two of the most commercially available algal species are rich in protein which supports muscle remodeling in young healthy adults.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Francisco -1 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Keeping things sterile is very labour and energy intensive, even in the Pharma industry, where the profit margins are orders of magnitude above what you can do in the food industry.

Look this will sound harsh, but it's not, really.

Your reasoning is good if you compare it to an hypothesis a student of Pasteur or Koch could have thought of 150 yrs ago.

Thus I have to ask you, why did you think you have a good take on this?

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart 8 points 11 months ago (2 children)

My cat is sterile and it only cost $135 once so what are you on about?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Nice username. You are my hero

[–] whostosay 2 points 11 months ago

Here we are again. Still got the most gnarly username lol

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Did you read what i wrote? i said "take inspiration from" not "should copy 1:1 also i work i pharma so yes i have a good take on this.

[–] fukhueson 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

When you're working with coproducts like algae-derived pharmaceuticals (see Lumen biotech in Seattle) that sell for 6 figures/kg you're correct, much more stringent pharma-like ideas do get implemented because the down time is costly. This is seen in indoor reactor setups where you can grow under artificial light year round. Outdoors, the cost to implement more sophisticated systems doesn't translate in your TEA especially when growing things like protein which is cheap in comparison.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Yeah you are probably right that cost will be the biggest issue when comparing between the two fields of production. Getting a good stable production that is also cheap enough to be viable is always the hurdle

[–] Francisco -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What you said on the 1st sentence is okay. After that, is clueless. ...in the context of discussing the difficulties - technical and economical - of growing specific algae for food.

After sterilising everything and sigeling out the alge you want you should in theory be able to run more or less indefinitely.

This is like saying that if there's sun and no clouds, in theory, the sky should be blue. In practice there's no useful information added to the discussion on the...

And if a contamination of found it just a matter of sterilizing everything with steam and reboot the system.

Like in all that is microbiology, kind of. Except steam is not sterilising. Unless under autoclave pressures. Inside an autoclave. Even in those conditions, which are agreed to be sterilising, even then not all microbes are killed and contamination is still considered as an issue in some cases. Again, in practice there's no useful information added to the discussion on the...

Your non-expert overconfidence is not unique. It's an epidemic. And that's why I'm triggered to comment on it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Again, in practice there’s no useful information added to the discussion on the

And by that logic neither have you added anything useful so far with two long posts in this thread. So I guess we are even now? :)

[–] feedum_sneedson 1 points 11 months ago

Thus, very nice, very nice.