this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2023
58 points (90.3% liked)

Canada

7273 readers
315 users here now

What's going on Canada?

Related Communities

🍁 Meta

πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories

πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.

πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer

πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.

πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales

πŸ—£οΈ Politics

🍁 Social / Culture

Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
58
Why North America zoning and building codes mean developers can't build nice family friendly "missing middle" housing/apartments (www.youtube.com)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by NarrativeBear to c/[email protected]
15 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

We need to make our cities and towns more family friendly. This is called the "missing middle" in housing, and it's why in north america all we see are either large condo towers or single family homes, which also drives our urban sprawl problems.

Almost all new large towers/buildings in north america prioritize bachelor's units 1 and 2 bedroom units. Trying to find a well priced 3 or 4 bedroom in a "lively" downtown center, close to transit and work, with plenty of schooling in the area is almost impossible. It's also a factor in why cities became so empty during the pandemic, ie. Not to many families living permanently in cities.

Here's a good article that also talks about the same issue with some different apparment layouts, and why developers don't provide adequate family units.

https://www.centerforbuilding.org/blog/we-we-cant-build-family-sized-apartments-in-north-america

This together with zoning requirements in north america is pushing most cities and developers to only cater towards large towers or single family housing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Bedrooms do have to have windows or a door to the outside to be legally a bedroom.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

windows or a door to the outside

Wow, do slimeball realtors play fast and loose with those regulations. I've seen "window to the living room" as the safety feature in a bedroom. Many of them here, too, brazenly show an 8x8 windowless space as a 'bedroom'; and with the demand, they can afford a few people questioning that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Not in chicago. Very common to have a bedroom that is almost right in the middle of the condo. door to the rest of the condo but not outside. Maybe they get away on some technicality bit its a common thing I have seen. It allows them to do these thin long condos in the high rises

[–] NarrativeBear 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That may be classified as a bachelor's unit with a "den", at least that's how it would be in Canada. A bedroom is only legally a bedroom once it has a window per the Ontario build code at least.

Though this is the issue, raising a family with two or more kids in a condo may not be something everyone would like to do. It's all personal preference in the end.

The trouble is the choice in the market is limited in types of homes, the desire may be there to find something other then a large condo tower, or a single family home, but developers cant build them because of the code.

So people can only choose to find a larger more expensive condo tower with a 3~4 full debrooms layout (which is hard), or move into a single family home in the suburbs a few hours out of the city center (which increases the commute).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

yeah. they advertise it as a bedroom but I would not be surprised if the paperwork did something like you say. Many of the traditional things have been being slanted for decades. what is called a studio nowadays would be called an efficiency when I was young.