this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2023
652 points (98.5% liked)

politics

19104 readers
3717 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Republicans in Ohio want to undermine the will of voters who approved a measure enshrining reproductive freedom into the state’s constitution

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jerome 226 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Republicans went against their own rules and held a special election in August to stop abortion; they lost. Republicans then lost in November and abortion rights were enshrined in Ohio's constitution. Now Republicans are saying no to democracy and laws.

Our problem here is all the Republicans. They're anti-American. Ship them off to a place that fits them better.

[–] [email protected] 139 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"If conservatives become convinced that they cannot win democratically, they will not abandon conservatism. They will reject democracy." - David Frum

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

See also the "We're a republic, not a democracy" talking point that swelled a year or two ago (and was even repeated by a senator). It's patently stupid to anyone who knows the meaning of those words, but it was also testing the water for overt anti-democracy rhetoric.

[–] CharlesDarwin 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Honestly, they've been well-actually-splaining that for quite a while now. Usually it goes along with a lecture about how "kids these days" are not forced to take a Civics class, and therefore, all these scholars have to step into the breach...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Very true. Subjectively, it just seemed to have a bit of a peak not too long ago. It was one of those right-wing talking points that got popular before they realized it was embarrassing and didn't work.

And yeah, I'm real sick of reactionary armchair "experts" who think they know more than people who actually study (and experience) the things they talk about with such confidence.

[–] FuglyDuck 28 points 1 year ago (3 children)

deserted island in... hmm. lets go with the south china sea.

[–] Captain_Patchy 34 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Fuck that, just send 'em to russia.

[–] FuglyDuck 16 points 1 year ago

Putin’s propaganda machine would love that. They even have a nice little village all ready to go,

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Here is uniform, Comrade, here is Z decal for your car, here is Chinese-made AK-47, here is map to Ukraine border, now go or you will be shot.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I hear Gaza is nice this time of year.

[–] FuglyDuck 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What? And give the Israelis more reason to bomb the place?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago

The Palestinians have enough problems to deal with already.

[–] CharlesDarwin 1 points 1 year ago

How about Somalia?

[–] CADmonkey 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Let them build their perfect society on (spins globe) Marion Island.

[–] FuglyDuck 2 points 1 year ago

I was thinking south china sea so that they get into trouble with china and wind up in one of their detention camps.

But that works, too.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

If all the conservatives consented to moving to the same new location uninhabitabed before yet the land provided all the basic needs, how would it work out?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They’d still find a way to divide and argue amongst themselves.

[–] CharlesDarwin 1 points 1 year ago

See for example the GOP in the House right now. Qbert vs. Marge, Kevin vs. Groomer Gaetz and so on...

[–] BradleyUffner 4 points 1 year ago

It probably wouldn't change anything. They have some kind of biological imperative to force their beliefs on other people that disagree with them.

[–] Olhonestjim 3 points 1 year ago

They'd genocide themselves in ever increasing purity purges.