this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2023
746 points (90.5% liked)

politics

19144 readers
2788 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lennybird 53 points 1 year ago (6 children)

It's a little sad because decades of right-wing anti-Hillary propaganda not only proved effective, but it noticeably altered Hillary into this jaded cynic completely lacking in vision or idealism. I'm not a huge Hillary fan, but the vast majority of the hate is completely manufactured outrage. That being said it doesn't change what you said being valid.

You can see them trying with AOC, but I suspect it won't yield the same results.

[–] crypticthree 45 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Dude she was a McGovern girl. She has always been an empty husk seeking power and validation

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago

She was a Goldwater Girl, which is orders of magnitude worse. McGovern would have been a massive improvement from Nixon.

[–] givesomefucks 39 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

There's always been this weird push from her supporters that's anyone who doesn't like her is either a misogynist or fell for propaganda.

They just refuse to admit she has any faults.

[–] drdabbles 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Supporters get awful quiet when you ask about her continued defense of her husband's misconduct and alleged sexual assaults. They get down right silent when you ask about her attacking his accusers.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I still believe she was offered the Democratic nomination (in the future) in exchange for not pulling the rug out from under Bill.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Those same people are beginning to do that with Kamala too. Thankfully it's not as widespread yet.

[–] ikidd 40 points 1 year ago

She did a good enough job maligning herself, she didn't need the Republicans to do it for her. The entire DNC primary was a shitshow of Clinton debasing the primaries and showing what she would do for power.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago

but it noticeably altered Hillary into this jaded cynic completely lacking in vision or idealism

it noticeably altered hillary clinton into hillary clinton

[–] batmaniam 6 points 1 year ago

There's a bunch of stances she's taken I view negatively but admit there's nuance.

Then there's DOMA. Anyone on that let it be known their principles for marginalized groups is only "as convenient", which means support of them should also only be as is convenient or useful. She is no longer convenient or useful.

[–] assassin_aragorn -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's weird because I can distinctly remember after 2008 that she was looked on favorably, as secretary of state. People made fun memes about her and found her likeable. Fox News really did a number on her.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

She was always the slimiest neoliberal around, and she walked up on stage and said shit like "women supporting women means you have to vote for me"

Hilary was respected because she got stuff done and mostly only spoke to the ownership class. She was never liked, and the more people saw her speak the less people liked her

Let's not forget, she made deals to get the presidency. She burned the trust and local campaign funds of the Democratic party just to lose.

Fox wasn't charitable to her, but chanting "lock her up" didn't ruin her image, she did a great job of that herself who looked deeper than sound bites