Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected].
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected] or [email protected]
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
view the rest of the comments
Littering is more acceptable to more people these days. Oh, and also fascism.
I think we've gotten to the point where we need to understand that people are lazy, and that voluntary initiatives aren't going to "save the planet". Environmentalists need to a) focus less on the public and more on govt policy b) consider that maybe technology to adapt to change is more realistic at this point than stopping the change and c) focus on the highest bang for buck tradeoffs, like short haul flights and animal agriculture.
I have my own stretch of Adopt-a-Highway, and I've been thinking that fining the source of the litter could be a way to force change and spur innovation. Like every piece of Taco Bell packaging I have to pick out of the ditch costs Yum! Brands $5.
I like the idea of fining the source, though obv it would need to be a bit more elaborate. For example, fining only non-biodegradable packaging. Ultimately though, some consumer behavior needs to change - fashion, for example, is something that people are so hooked onto that it's hard to get people to change. Meat is hard because most people run away screaming when someone says "vegan". Flights are hard because the follow up question is bound to be "where's the train"... and there is no train. All of those things are policy based. I think France has some good ideas with banning short haul flights and taxing meat, but even they have a long way to go.
Yeah, my scheme is riddled with holes and admittedly not well thought through.