this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2023
89 points (89.4% liked)

politics

19144 readers
3414 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] steventhedev 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So the Senate statement was against pro-Hamas student groups, not pro-Palestinian groups.

Hamas is a designated Foreign Terrorist Organization. Saying you support them is not illegal. Providing any sort of help like donations or actual aid is extremely so.

The greater trend they're trying to track here is cherry picking examples that are less clear cut than the student group chanting "we don't want two states! We want it all! From the river to the sea!"

But this is a uniquely American issue - almost every other country on the planet treats hate speech as illegal.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (3 children)

nobody is pro Hamas, the problem is they're saying that being pro palestine is being pro hamas

[–] DontJumpOffBoats 1 points 1 year ago

nobody is pro Hamas Lol

[–] qnick -3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Try to create a pro-Russian post now, and then explain in the comments that it's not pro-Kremlin.

[–] Viking_Hippie 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yeah, that's fucked up too. People seem unable and unwilling to seperate innocent civilians from atrocious leaders.

This is what happens when you allow corporations and demagogues to take over both politics and media 😮‍💨

[–] qnick 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Context matters. If you post something pro-Russian and against the Kremlin in 2020, some people might understand you. But if you do it a week after Bucha, don't expect any support.

[–] Viking_Hippie 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yeah because you're not allowed to distinguish between innocent civilians and the government they have no power to topple unless you time it juuuuust right 🙄

Fuck that. There's never a bad time for speaking up for innocent victims of violence and oppression while condemning the powerful people that kill and oppress them.

[–] qnick -5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My point is: no matter what was the goal of protesters, these protests benefit Hamas. Therefore people participating in it are perceived as pro-Hamas.

[–] Viking_Hippie 1 points 1 year ago

They don't benefit Hamas, though. The goal of the protests is an end to immediate hostilities and in the long term a peaceful resolution to the overall conflict.

Both would be ruinous to Hamas and the Israeli war hawks while being beneficial to all of the innocent civilians.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

the russian people - much like the people in gaza - aren't the people fighting the war

it's why sanctions never work because they're always passed on to the most vulnerable

it's also the same thing they do every war like during iraq when they said if you're against the war you're worth the terrorists/saddam.

he's not the first to do it but bush definitely set the narrative in the media

[–] Eldritch 2 points 1 year ago

Pro citizenry posts are almost never controversial. If you're getting a lot of blowback you may be doing it wrong. Pro fascist government posts, however, will rightly get a lot of pushback if you don't differentiate. It is uncontroversial to support the Russian people, the American people, the Israeli people, the Palestinian people, etc.

[–] Viking_Hippie 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

the Senate statement was against pro-Hamas student groups, not pro-Palestinian groups.

Not true. Like most of rest of the government, the Senate don't distinguish between the two, lumping in advocating on behalf of innocent civilians with support of terrorism.

It's the "BDS should be illegal" bullshit all over again 🤬

[–] steventhedev -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

From the article you clearly didn't read:

... the U.S. Senate passed a unanimous resolution condemning what it called “anti-Israel, pro-Hamas student groups” ...

[–] Viking_Hippie 8 points 1 year ago

Yeah I did. Operative words being WHAT IT CALLED pro-Hamas.

Claiming that them calling every pro-Palestine student group pro-Hamas proves that it's true is some asinine circular logic and/or blind trust that the people in charge are reasonable and unbiased rather than corrupt demagogues with financial ties to the apartheid regime and its PR apparatus.