this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2023
392 points (90.3% liked)

196

16744 readers
2238 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Remember, the social Democrats sided with the Nazis over the socialists. They’ve done it every time they’ve been given the opportunity, and will continue to do so as many times as people fall for their shtick.

“The master's tools will never dismantle the master's house."
-Audre Lorde

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you heavily regulated companies, nationalize every major public service, place an upper cap to overall wealth for any one individual, eliminate inherited wealth and redirect all available resources to public education, health care, housing and UBI .... then democracy could exist in a capitalist system.

But chances are we'll more likely start WWIII with nuclear weapons than do any of that.

[–] javasux 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

But that's not capitalism, that's market socialism

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I thought regulated capitalism and market socialism were the same thing

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

the difference between capitalism and socialism is whether companies are privately or publicly owned, so while it looks similar, it's really not the same. this would be a social democratic society, and therefore not socialist

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So European brands of socialism aren't socialism in your view?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

what do you mean, European brands of socialism?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

socialism, by definition, means that "companies" are publicly owned. so while this would be a good start for a socal democratic society, its nowhere near democratic socialism or even communism