this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2023
159 points (80.7% liked)

Ask Lemmy

26749 readers
2838 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

It serms incredible to me to give over a billion dollars to a random person.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 107 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It’s grotesque for ANYONE to have a billion dollars. Arguably the lottery winner is the only one to achieve that wealth by even sort-of ethical means.

[–] Bondrewd 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

By that measure, playing the stock exchange is just an advanced version of lottery.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Bondrewd -5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yep. Kind of ethical if you ask me... :P

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Not really. Dividends always include value stolen from the workforce and the end customer in low pay and shoddier quality as enforced via a policy of shareholder primacy.

Anyone who hold stocks in a private company is stealing from the public.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Not since Dodge v. Ford Motor Company

Das Kapital explains its inevitability.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Where is an ethical place I can put my retirement money then?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

A coffee can? A vault? In our agrarian economy, your extended family would take care of you in your geriatric years, but now because of the nuclear family we have to manage our own retirement (and suffer intergenerational mental illness).

401Ks and such are the proffered substitutes, but in good times they depend on exploitation. In bad times (such as right after the 2008 subprime mortgage crisis) they collapse with the rest of the economy and the banks throw their customers to the elements.

It's a situation much like the US dependence on cars, since alternatives are dismantled or delayed, and regulations turn our urban areas into an untraversable sprawl. Cars are bad, but we've been systematically stripped of alternatives.

[–] Keepitpushin 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

My guess you never heard of stock manipulation.

[–] MyFairJulia 3 points 1 year ago

The Spiffing Brit enters the chat

[–] Bondrewd -4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Technically you are investing in stocks they allow you to. Perfectly ethical.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

It is, except for the way that money is derived from the labour of the workers, and the fact that you're not likely to make lifestyle changing amounts of money without already having a significant amount of money to gamble in the first place.

Not to mention the system is arguably much more "rigged" thanks to the major players in the scene, when you buy a lottery ticket you aren't competing against giant corporations that spend millions on figuring out the best way to buy lottery tickets.

[–] Cocodapuf 1 points 1 year ago

Well it's like a lottery but with more variables and where better knowledge or analysis can mean some "players"are more likely to win than others. It's inherently less fair than a lottery, which should be totally random.

[–] cricket97 -5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

there are people who have over a billion dollars worth of positive impact on the world.

[–] ook_the_librarian 2 points 1 year ago

That's not grotesque and that's not wealth. But still a nice thought to keep in mind.

I wish these people were as famous as the loud-ass billionaires we have.

[–] Olhonestjim 0 points 1 year ago

There certainly have been such people. But none were ever billionaires. Such people do something which creates great value. Billionaires are parasites who do nothing but siphon value away from society.

Albert Einstein, Nikolai Vavilov, Marie Curie, Martin Luther King Jr, Alan Turing, Abraham Lincoln, Michael Faraday, Nelson Mandela, Isaac Newton, Edward Jenner, Harriet Tubman, Louis Pasteur, etc.