this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2023
844 points (98.3% liked)

News

23268 readers
5613 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Apparently some of the Republicans are talking about nominating Trump as speaker. The speaker doesn't technically need to be a member of congress. I wonder if there are enough anti-Trump republicans in the House to block that. If it's a close vote and certain congress people block Trump, they could get a mountain of hate.

[–] clutchmatic 33 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Amazing that the founding fathers didn't contemplate the possibility of a felon under active lawsuits becoming speaker

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (2 children)

In defense of the founding fathers, they were all traitors to the crown and enemies of the state when they wrote that.

[–] CADmonkey 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Possibly they were young and drunk too.

[–] Raiderkev 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They also sold drugs, ran guns, and said fuck the law. This documentary touches on it.

https://youtu.be/ABhyKEK-CDg?si=5g1fbVMMqLtoJoSR

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago
[–] Agent641 1 points 1 year ago

Boys will be boys

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

They probably didn't contemplate having an active child Diddler be speaker from 1987-2007 either, but Republicans sure love their historic firsts.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The founding fathers were amazingly shit at game theory.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Considering no one would formalize game theory for 150 years it's not particularly surprising.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

You don't need to necessarily formalize game theory to consider things like: hey, we just gave the president the authority to pardon. Couldn't they abuse that? What if they pardon someone who was doing something illegal that they ordered? What if they commit a crime and pardon themselves?

I mean, that's the most obvious one that you don't really need formal game theory to know could be a problem. Then there are all the other problems. Checks and balances are good, but when a powerful faction uses its power to put loyalists into the thing that's supposed to balance them, the system seems to unravel.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They didn't even contemplate the House Speaker being in the Presidential line of succession. Which is the reason they want to put Trump there. Not that it would work; they'd have to remove both the President and Vice President at the same time, and the Senate ain't going to do that.

[–] clutchmatic 2 points 1 year ago

An angry mob with strong will to unalive certain people before the #3 in the line of succession would be a major concern

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Only 3-4 republican votes are needed to block any candidate since the Democrats will all be voting against.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Yes, but if Trump is on board, can you imagine the mountain of hate mail and death threats those 3-4 would receive? Would they have the guts to accept that consequence?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago

This is one of the least likely scenarios.

[–] Lemminary 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That sounds scary if possible

[–] elscallr 0 points 1 year ago
[–] sturmblast 10 points 1 year ago

that ain't going to happen

[–] psmgx 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Speaker of the house is 3rd in line to take over if the VP and Pres are dead or unavailable.

Question is if you think that MAGA and foreign intelligence would be up for forcing that issue.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Making Trump speaker would be a major national security risk to Biden and Harris. Gives way too many lunatics big ideas is there's a direct benefit to their movement. Not to mention it WAYYY to closely mirrors the arc of Hitlers rise. Failed coup attempt, followed by taking on a secondary post a few years later.