Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected] or [email protected]
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected].
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
view the rest of the comments
I regularly wonder how people could come together within capitalism and make this happen.
Best I can think of is establishing minimum overhead living conditions through some sort of commune type structure where you can either pay a minimal rent to live there or contribute a base amount of labour and spend the rest of your time doing what you think should be done.
It would probably work best if it were a kind of temporary measure, something you’d swing in and out of. Tough part is getting started. But I’m sure if enough people doing relatively well got together and chipped in stuff could happen.
It’s extremely challenging for many right now due to insanely depressed wages. No doubt about that.
But for those lucky enough to have savings and their very basic needs covered, there are quite a few people deciding to live with less instead of constantly gunning for more. The FIRE movement is a pretty decent example. But even things like vanlife and rural homesteading are also along the same lines.
Others spend like crazy, barely staying within their means even when incomes skyrocket. Of course, this is what capitalism allows/causes/benefits from the most. And it’s easy to get sucked into. But it’s not the only way.
I think about this a lot too. One idea I think about is a worker coop where the stated goals are to improve worker quality of life. So first maybe a four day work week, and initiatives related to affordable housing, free healthcare, education, etc. Inevitably would probably need to be an ecosystem of organizations, since how do you spin it up from nothing.
But we're constantly getting more efficient in our work, it doesn't have to be the case that when we do a job in less time or with fewer people then the reward is more work.