this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2023
981 points (96.5% liked)

politics

19144 readers
2862 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A gay doctor who is one of Louisiana’s only specialist paediatric cardiologists has left the state after the introduction of a Don’t Say Gay copycat bill and a ban on gender-affirming care for trans youth.

Jake Kleinmahon, who was one of just three doctors specialising in heart transplants for children in Louisiana, chose to leave the state with his family, as they no longer felt safe.

Kleinmahon met and fell in love with his husband Tom in New Orleans, and the couple expected remain in Louisiana, even after retirement. However, he told CNN that the state’s anti-LGBTQ+ legislation made him and his family feel unwelcome and that he ultimately “didn’t have a choice”.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 137 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

So long as the majority left behind in the state are GOP voters, they couldn't care less about how many people get harmed or die from their policies ...

E: spelling

[–] WorldWideLem 68 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Part of what makes religion so useful, to suffer becomes virtuous.

[–] SinningStromgald 52 points 1 year ago

Then I hope they choke on all their virtue.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago

I wish them nothing but unyielding neverending virtue

[–] afraid_of_zombies 3 points 1 year ago

You aren't wrong. The ideal is always something that if everyone achieved it the civilization would end.

[–] Acronymesis 28 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Personally, I think this is all part of the plan. Chase the lefties out of their states so that they can solidify their majority, keeping themselves in power.

Do this with enough states, and they can kick off a constitutional convention.

[–] Serinus 1 points 1 year ago

I do wonder if they're doing the same with Twitter and Reddit.

[–] assassin_aragorn 1 points 1 year ago

They don't have the numbers. 19 states have majority Democrat Senate and Houses, and they need 66% of state legislatures to call one. They would only need two more states, but there's several problems with that. For one, not every Republican is on board, and the more moderate ones know how destabilizing it would be for moneyed interests. There's also a great chance it would plunge us into a civil war, and there's no guarantee that ends well for them. I think it's likely to be the opposite.

They're unlikely to even get to that point however because consolidating power in existing red states is actually counterproductive. They ensure a state that they already have will remain theirs, at the expense of chasing people out to other states, including swing states, who will be incredibly angry against their party. Plus, you have Republicans in these states moving to the red states as conservative havens. The net effect, states that aren't solid red are going to get more Democrat voters, and they're already struggling with a dwindling Republican voter base.

Knock on wood I'm right and this isn't just baseless optimism

[–] afraid_of_zombies -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That requires a lot of things to happen in a specific combination.

[–] Acronymesis 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] afraid_of_zombies -5 points 1 year ago

True, they had to wait for the deaths of two people elderly people who had well known medical problems. Sheesh what are the odds an 87 year old woman would die within a 2 year window?

Instead of here where they need tens of millions of people to migrate. Meanwhile they will continue to have to issue precise strikes on the few functional parts of their own economy. Georgia for example will need the population of Atlanta and Athens and Augusta and Columbus to pack up and leave. Those areas have reps of their own and will just sit their quitely while their own consistency is driven out?

I almost want them to try, on some level, just to see how badly this will go. "Ok we put a tax on lattes in Atlanta, that should do it".

[–] Ensign_Crab 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

they could care less about how many people get harmed or die from their policies …

Oh, they care. They prefer the harm and death.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

The cruelty is the point