this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023
381 points (97.3% liked)

News

23390 readers
3066 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Former President Trump criticized the judge presiding over his 2020 election case, just days after she warned him against making any “inflammatory statements” that could intimidate witnesses or prejudice the jury pool.

In a statement posted overnight on Truth Social, Trump called U.S. District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan “highly partisan” and “very biased & unfair.”

“She obviously wants me behind bars,” he added.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 61 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

As I understand it, knowing that throwing him in jail in contempt of court would likely set off riots, her threat to him for interfering in the process was to speed up the trial. Considering his only real defense is pushing conviction until after the election, I think Trump will soon learn the meaning of “the right to a speedy trial.”

EDIT: Source

[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 year ago

Good to know that threats of violence are effective in suppressing justice.

[–] Plaid_Kaleidoscope 16 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I'm torn, because I think that incitement would bring about the end of the trump era much more quickly, as it'll get put down hard. But I also don't want to advocate violence or for stupid people to get hurt for no reason other than their ignorance.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Ignorance has been out the window for a decade. These people knowingly engaged in falsehoods long enough to convince themselves they're right, and I am sick of giving them a pass as if they're just dumb, poorly informed, unable to find alternatives to their hate rhetoric, etc.

At a certain point, it's malice. The saying about not attributing to malice what can be explained by ignorance is for situations *where all else is equal." We are beyond that point.

Throw the book at him. Let them riot and ruin their own shithole counties, or let them try to drive to big cities to attack them, and then throw the book at them too. I'm done accepting responsibility for the actions of these people, who have been given countless opportunities to not be assholes.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Ignorance punishes itself every day. Yes we should try to prevent it, but Facebook will build a bigger idiot.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

It’s not just ignorance. There’s a lot of malice, too.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

we have the worlds most advanced, trained, and funded army. Lets let them riot..Lets follow up with force and throw them all in jail.

We can't let the justice system bow to the threat of violence.

[–] mercano 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The thing is, both sides have a right to a speedy trial. The prosecution, and the citizens they represent, have been waiting three and a half years already.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@mercano @wrath-sedan

Simply because of the complexity of it all. I mean it's never happened before so the DOJ and state justice dept's had to triple-check that each and every "i" was dotted and "t" was crossed. Never mind the millions of pages of evidence that had be collated, then backed up from other sources.

It is mind-boggling it's only been 3.5 years!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

It can take a year and a half to convict a mass shooter caught red-handed.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then let there be riots. The man needs his due.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That’s why there’s an Insurrection Act.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Right? This whole "we can't punish criminals because other criminals might engage in criminal behavior" attitude is mystifying to me. What ever happened with not negotiating with terrorists as a national policy?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is very odd, someone was claiming we should have let him win the other day because this would have been less dangerous. That is so fucked up. Appeasement is almost never a viable long-term solution is politics and geo-politics. The best time to deal with an abusive force is yesterday, not pulling the Band-Aid early is just making things worse. They will riots anyway, unless he turns America into autocracy, only at this point we won't have to worry about riots.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It is very odd, someone was claiming we should have let him win the other day because this would have been less dangerous.

Anyone saying that is either a shill or a coward, and neither are people we should listen to. Our grandparents and great grandparents didn't sacrifice everything in WWII just for us to allow fucking Nazis to waltz into power uncontested.

[–] matter 2 points 1 year ago

The very scenario that quote came from was one of... Extensive, and disastrous, negotiation with terrorists. So, not much has changed.

[–] JustZ 1 points 1 year ago

There won't be any riots when he goes to jail. There will be ten dumb fat people nobody gives a fuck about that show up with their Trump colors, and if they fuck around they will end up in jail with Trump.