Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected]
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected].
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
view the rest of the comments
People absolutely do not have a right to push ideologies that harm, dehumanize, or diminish other people.
They do, they just have to deal with people who think their ideas are worthless. You can even make laws against ideas you don't like, but they'll be even less effective than drug prohibition. Just look at China for a great example of that.
So in your world it is acceptable for me to say that you're an evil person for disagreeing with me and should be shot where you stand?
That's absolutely ridiculous, and actually a crime in a decent number of the countries. And if that's not what you're saying I think that you don't actually know what your free speech maximalism means, because people who believe those things and say those things exist and they want to hurt people.
Yes, what is anyone going to do to stop you? That's why America has free speech at the very first right defined in the bill of rights.
The fediverse allows anyone to set up their own instances with their own rules and beliefs. It's simply the consequence of freedom of speech.
Those people and ideas you want to ban will always be there. If you make it so people have to hide them, it just makes it easier for the ideas to spread. It's better if they are openly criticized and refuted rather than swept under the rug.
Then explain why i cant scream FIRE in a movie theater, or call a mall and tell them I'm going to bomb them, or walk up to someone on the street and say "give me all your money or i'll blow your brains out". After all its all just speech isn't it?
You can, you'll just face legal consequences for disturbing the peace or threatening others.
Notice how you get in trouble after you say something. The idea that a government can stop you from saying or thinking something is silly. How would you even enforce such a thing?
That's why the rights in the American's constitution are considered "inalienable", because even if there were (illegal) laws made to stop you from saying or thinking something, your right to do so is innate and can never truly be taken from you.
Am I taking crazy pills?
You missed the part of my comment where I pointed out you must have done something to be charged with a crime. The Government did not stop you, they are punishing you for something you did.
Your right to say and do whatever you want is immutable and cannot be taken away from you. As long as you have a mind, you have the ability to think and do what you want.
All that anyone can do to stop you is to threaten you with punishment of some kind, hoping it'll deter you from doing that thing in the first place.
Are you high? Do you think governments are run by witches who can hex people? Of course the government can't stop you from physically saying something!
The same way they can't stop you from building a bomb, cooking meth, stabbing someone in an alley, or anything else that's illegal.
The way laws work is to prevent people from doing things by making them illegal, what are you talking about?
I am just explaining the concept of "inalienable rights".
As I said in my very first comment in this chain, no one can stop you from posting anything you want on the fediverse. You can always move to another instance or even setup your own instances.
I don't like tankies or nazis either, but they exist and they can't be banned from the fediverse like they can be banned from reddit.
This is the classic argument of "banning nazis just makes them stronger, we have to debate them away!" No, that's not how this works. That's not how any of this works.
Who said anything about debate? You mock and demonize them openly. You make it not cool to be a nazi. Look at what Chapo Trap House does for example. They aren't afraid to mock these clowns for their moronic ideologies.
Banning it and taking the "holier than thou" approach just makes it cool and edgy to be extremely far right. It's extremely easy to get people very upset with almost no effort, so of course that's going to be what edgy kids gravitate towards. Same reason the edgy kids were "Satanists" back in the 70s and 80s. It wasn't that they were persuaded by satanism, it was easy to get a reaction from the Christian fundies and took no effort at all.
If you allow people to make a fool of themselves it dissuades others from doing that behavior.
I agree with this, but what you're missing is that you don't need them to be here to make fun of them. Screenshot their shit on whatever hole they've squandered off to, and mock them with that. You don't need them to be a part of our spaces to mock them.
It isn't really a matter of need or wanting something, they exist, and they will spread their views regardless of what we do. That's the reality of the situation.
You can't just ban them from the fediverse like you can ban them from a website, because such a capability is not built into the fediverse. It's like saying we should ban nazi websites. That is impossible because they can simply set up their own websites on their own servers in countries that don't care or even support their views. The same is true for the fediverse, they can (and already have) setup their own instances which are friendly to those kinds of views.
I think it's prudent to talk about how things are and what the best way to deal with them is, rather than how things ought to be. Most people can agree that genocide and racism shouldn't exist.
This is not true, it is a lie specifically spread by nazis to convince you not to do anything about them. Banning nazis works. Nazis can't be banned from the fediverse this time, but you can block their instances. It accomplishes the same goal, cutting off their ability to spread their ideology.
If banning nazis truly worked, then there would be no nazis to ban in 2023.
But as you said, the best that can be done is to block them, and I again suggest also mocking them. Block & mock.