politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
As much as I hate Trump, there's a logic in this. VOA has always been a publicly-funded propaganda mouthpiece. They are NOT an independent media. Independence entails not taking money from people you want to criticize.
If VOA refuses to spew out the latest flavor of propaganda, they're not doing their job.
VOA takes money from US taxpayers, not the Trump administration. Criticizing Trump is about as pro-American as that news organization can get.
Not only that, the VOA literally has its own law requiring it to be impartial and protecting it from direct interference by the US government.
The President has plenty of propaganda tools at his disposal without having a "news organization" make shit up.
But what you don't understand is that VOA is not a news organization. It was created during WW2 by the Office of the Coordinator of Information for the express purpose of spreading pro-American propaganda in Germany and in Japan. And it has kept doing exactly that ever since.
I remember it showering the USSR with pro-American high-power shortwave radio broadcasts in Russian and in English when I was a kid in the 70's. Everybody knew VOA was America's response to radio Moscow.
VOA is quite explicitely a propaganda thing. Really! You guys can downvote me all you want, it's the plain truth. VOA journalists are quite literally paid to spread American propaganda.
His Orangeness has decided to turn the country around 180 degrees and make it a fascist pro-Russia state and I despise him with all my heart. But Trump is right: the VOA has no business not being 100% aligned with him.
That makes the VOA an enemy of freedom, democracy and common decency, just like Trump.
From the VOA website:
Also: Elon Musk says he’s a genius.
Man of course VOA says they’re independent media. Now please find a truly independent analysis that says the same?
The point is they're supposed to at least keep up the pretext of not being propaganda, and this is done by being critical when permitted. Trump doesn't want them to be critical of him at all, which goes against their mandate from Congress.
Elon Musk managed to more or less keep up the appearance of being smart for a long while, up to when he called that diver a pedo.
VOA, RFA, RFE, and a shitton of others are nothing but propaganda machines for the US
So you're going with "freedom of speech doesn't apply if you work for the government"?
It would be better if it did, but you shouldn't be surprised if it doesn't, anymore than you should expect the Washington Post to criticize Bezos or Fox News Rupert Murdoch.
Except for the whole "first amendment" part, remember? Bezos isn't legally prohibited from infringing on freedom of the press.
The government isn't allowed to do things an individual might be able to.
You're literally arguing that the first amendment doesn't apply to government employees, which is absolute horseshit.
No it doesn't. Criticizing those that fund you would literally be one of the more independent things a group could do.
You shouldn't be downvoted, but this isn't true. While partially funded by Congress, the VOA's mission is not propaganda.
Now, we can debate how much this is true in practice, and I'm sure the governmental structure of the organisation means the government can put their thumb on the scale somewhat, but the mission means they're at least meant to keep the pretext of being independent and free.
But Trump doesn't understand that. In his eyes, he's paying for it (not Congress nor the American voters/taxpayers) and if he's paying for it he gets to boss them around.
VOA is less objective than RT.
/s
I think you are getting down voted, not because you are wrong, but because that truth is particularly unpleasant.
It would be like radio free Europe criticising Regan's policies during the cold war.
The number of people thinking the AID in USAID implies assistance is insane. The number of media outlets receiving propaganda money from USAID to spread US propaganda is insane.
Bootlicker.
What part of "As much as I hate Trump" don't you understand?
The part where you then licked the boots, most likely.
"I'm a staunch vegetarian, but even I like a big ribeye once in a while". You can see why people might disregard the first part.
It's hard to focus on where you say you dislike trump when the following bit is where you justify calling criticism of him treason.