this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2025
899 points (96.9% liked)

196

16890 readers
612 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
899
rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Guys, at this rate I don't think the revolution's going to happen anytime soon.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (15 children)

That's not a Centrist viewpoint at all. That's a solidly right viewpoint.

The Centrist would, however, say "look, if you're going to make your whole vibe about tolerance, that's cool. I love it. But my homie, that's a slippery slope you haven't fully negotiated yet. So when your less disciplined people start to be big picture tolerant through on-paper intolerance, don't expect me to do the same mental gymnastics to defend it that you do with your mom at Thanksgiving. How about you solve the problem before you create it by not being sloppy and bumbling your way into an obvious trap every bully has pulled since the dawn of time?"

But hey, as a Centrist, the Left can't discern me from someone like Bush 43 or a raging MAGA freak because anything right of far left is a legit fascist. Which is why I cant hang with you all, your labels are weird. But the Right usually wants to hang me for being a traitor, so one of y'all is far more worth dealing with occasional cringe.

[–] LengAwaits 10 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I'm still always surprised when people say "slippery slope" in earnest, as though it isn't a well-known logical fallacy to be avoided. As though, at no point along the slope, would we be able to reverse course. "This thing must necessarily lead to that thing over time!"

Okay Nostradamus.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's only a fallacy when there is not evidence given that each step leads to the next. A slippery slope argument is perfectly valid when evidence is provided.The fallacy is in the implicit and unexamined assumption that a must lead to b.

E.g

Taking heroin once is obviously a slippery slope to becoming a heroin addict because taking it once causes you to crave taking it again.

[–] LengAwaits 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

100% agreed. I used the graphic to illustrate the point but really should have just linked to the Wikipedia article, which explains the difference.

In the instance I replied to, the slippery slope is invoked but the steps are not described, and no evidence is provided.

Besides, I'd argue (in good company) that centrism is and has been a cloak for fascism.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)