this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2024
534 points (98.0% liked)

196

16851 readers
2077 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
534
rule (files.catbox.moe)
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

inb4 “it’s actually 14 kb 🤓” it’s the joy that is 1kb in size, here’s an image that’s 1kb:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Eheran 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I honestly expect more from 1 kByte. Or do you mean bit?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

i mean kilobyte. depending on the format, colorspace, and bit depth, the size is limited to somewhere less than 128x128–i think this i set to 32x32 while keeping a bit more depth

[–] Eheran 1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I have very good looking images that are at around 100 kiB, hence I would expect 1/100th to be more than 32x32, which are only 1024. 100x that is only 0.1 MP, hence well below my expectation. Of course smaller resolutions will be less efficient due to overhead etc....

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

i encourage all to to comress your own version haha. definitely possible with bmp but that doesn’t display in my browser.

[–] Eheran 1 points 3 weeks ago

Not anywhere near a PC over the holidays :D

[–] SkunkWorkz 1 points 3 weeks ago

The more pixels an image has the better the jpg compression ratio will be. Especially if there are many pixels that are similar in color.

[–] GreyJolly 1 points 3 weeks ago

"A bit more bit depth" sounds funny to say