this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2024
1039 points (99.1% liked)

politics

19222 readers
2745 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Senator Bernie Sanders is intensifying his fight against U.S. oligarchy, targeting wealthy individuals like Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, and Mark Zuckerberg.

Sanders argues that these billionaires manipulate the global economy, influence elections, and control the government, hindering democracy and exacerbating global inequality.

He believes this issue is crucial, impacting various aspects of society, including climate change, healthcare, worker protections, and poverty.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 201 points 3 days ago (5 children)

As someone not from the US (but who has lived/worked/studied in the US), Sanders seems like the only member of the US upper house that is willing to speak honestly and engage in haram speech that goes against local provincial orthodoxy.

I was particularly intrigued by an article that claimed that Sanders was the only "outsider" in the US upper house and that all other senators were more or less on friendly terms (with the implication being that their polemics are a ruse). Unfortunately I can't find the article.

[–] TheDemonBuer 111 points 3 days ago

Sanders seems like the only member of the US upper house that is willing to speak honestly and engage in haram speech that goes against local provincial orthodoxy.

He is, and he's loved by millions of Americans for it, and also hated by essentially the entire political establishment for it.

[–] [email protected] 59 points 3 days ago (2 children)

As someone not from the US (but who has lived/worked/studied in the US), Sanders seems like the only member of the US upper house that is willing to speak honestly and engage in haram speech that goes against local provincial orthodoxy.

As someone from the US, Sanders seems exactly like this to me, also.

Apologies if you already know this, but Sanders is not a Democrat. He caucuses with them and runs as a Democrat, but he's not a member of the Democratic Party. Depending on the article they may have been referring to that. (IMO this is one of many reasons the DNC ensured he couldn't get the nomination in 2016 and 2020.)

[–] [email protected] 31 points 3 days ago (2 children)

It's honestly too bad he is not in his 40s. At the risk of being overly presumptuous, I will speculate that he would be a good leader for the US and the "free world".

[–] christhebaker 19 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Who are the younger politicians he is mentoring to carry the torch? I wish my home country had someone like him to follow and support.

[–] lennybird 48 points 3 days ago (3 children)

AOC. She entered Congress in 2018 and was inspired by Sanders and shares his philosophy. She is the next iteration of him for sure.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The rest of the squad too, to varying degrees. He's also been stumping for and both officially and unofficially advising many state and local level progressive hopefuls.

And that's not even counting how many he's simply inspired to run for office or otherwise help improve things with his "Not me, us" campaigns that almost succeeded in overturning the relentless propaganda machine of what's probably the richest political party in the world when not counting one party states.

[–] Ensign_Crab -1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

The rest of the squad too, to varying degrees. He’s also been stumping for and both officially and unofficially advising many state and local level progressive hopefuls.

I think that centrist Democrats were so on board with Netanyahu's genocide in exchange for AIPAC heavily funding opponents to progressives, and members of the squad in particular.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Nah, "centrist" (actually center right to right wing) politicians were already all in on zionism.

Their AIPAC owner donors going after the progressive rivals that expose how fundamentally dishonest and corrupt they are was just an extra bonus for them.

[–] kreskin 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It'd be helpful for AOC to walk this back now that Harris is gone. And not repeat it if she wants to be president someday: https://electronicintifada.net/content/aoc-votes-back-israel-lobbys-bogus-anti-semitism-definition/50066

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Doubt. But time will tell, I'd like to be surprised once again.

[–] christhebaker 6 points 3 days ago

Yea she seems like she shares similar views. I hope to see more progressive politicians in my lifetime that actually inspire and force change. The future looks very bleak for progressivism in the US right now though.

[–] whotookkarl 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The progressive caucus, https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congressional_Progressive_Caucus

Because of the two party system each party is composed of a coalition of political caucuses. Progressive policy is popular among the US working class when not packaged as an ism or ist, so it has a strong position in the house and basically no support in the senate.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Fastest way to lose your typical American living pay-to-pay is to start talking about how privileged they are. I'm glad people seem to have finally caught on to that, took long enough.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

No such thing.

[–] Ensign_Crab 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Apologies if you already know this, but Sanders is not a Democrat.

Yeah, that's still a sore spot since it was one of the justifications given by centrists for how they were fine with him getting ratfucked in 2016.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 days ago

all other senators were more or less on friendly terms

This is true for the parties as a whole. They are far too comfortable trading positions of power between themselves because they're all interested in keeping themselves in the ranks of the privileged. Neither party is willing to make any serious changes that would risk upsetting the balance for the greater good. They don't want change. Not actual meaningful change.

They have their elections and one party rules for a while before switching to the other, but the poor remain poor and the powerless remain powerless. Meanwhile they keep (or expand) their wealth and influence.

They may oppose each other in some ideologies, but make no mistake that they're on the same side when it comes to their own privilege.

Bernie is on the outside of this, which is why they will keep him down at all costs. He's a threat to their power structure.

[–] idiomaddict 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

all other senators were more or less on friendly terms

Except for Ted Cruz. Everyone hates Ted Cruz.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

Al Franken likes Ted Cruz more than most people, and he hates Ted Cruz.