A lot of people on the left seem to hold The Authoritarian Personality by Adorno et al. and The Mass Psychology of Fascism by Reich in very high regard.

These are very old books. The Adorno book has been criticised for methodological reasons. The Reich book is very rooted in Freudian psychoanalysis. Yet they still seem to be widely read and discussed.

I am not a psychologist. Can psychologists please tell me if these works are still considered to be useful and supported by the available evidence? I feel awfully skeptical when someone backs their point up by citing them and I want to know whether I should unclench my arse.

Thank you :)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] TotallynotJessica 8 points 3 days ago

Freudian psychology is only relevant as a therapeutic technique, not as a way of understanding. The evidence does demonstrate its effectiveness for certain people with certain diagnoses, but like other older methods, the doctor can often project their expectations into the patient.

The sad truth is that psychology is in its infancy, with our understandings getting rewritten at a rapid rate. It's still the best tool we have, but it's important to realize just how little we know.

I'm early gen z, but when I was a kid, I couldn't even have gotten diagnosed with both autism and ADHD. We now know that most people with autism have ADHD, yet it wasn't even possible to get dual diagnosed until 2011.

This isn't because science was done incorrectly, but because it was done correctly. Any leftist ideas built on psychological frameworks will have the same challenge as the books you mentioned. Psychology just moves fast.