this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
79 points (97.6% liked)

3DPrinting

15687 readers
315 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: [email protected] or [email protected]

There are CAD communities available at: [email protected] or [email protected]

Rules

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![](URL)

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sad to see them go this way, but not unexpected, thanks to the article by Josef Prusa where he complains about open source.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] j4k3 49 points 1 week ago (11 children)

They haven't been really open source for a long time. The move away from Merlin's configurations based software and onto custom code that only a full time dev can effectively modify was a major shot against the roots of RepRap and the community around Adrian Bowyer that Joe was a part of and got him started.

Nothing lasts forever, but the move away from open source officially marks the end of me going out of my way to purchase from them or recommend them.

Long live the kit makers and sources like LDO and Voron. The community created the 3d printing hobby, not the companies, not some guy that throws beer parties with llamas in the Czech Republic.

[–] riodoro1 25 points 1 week ago (6 children)

He’s just trying to make money and not get butt fucked by the Chinese on every corner.

Not everyone needs to be an open source die hard, and that doesn’t necessarily take away from the products quality.

[–] AliasVortex 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

True, you can have a quality closed source product (look at Bamboo or Stratasys), it's more lamenting than at one point Prusa was THE open source die hard (and that's earned them a fair bit of goodwill in a community that generally respects that (on account of only existing because of open source culture)).

Needing to make money is completely valid and understandable, which is what makes this less of an outright outrage and more of an "I'm not angry, I'm just disappointed" kind of situation.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Bamboo is a pretty good company for printers, do not lump them in with the glue drinkers at stratasys. Ive worked st many companys that own products from them, there the HP inkjet subscription nightmares. You gotta buy the speciality filliment from them that come in chartrages with a chip to verify its geninue filliment. You must buy the plastic replacment beds, which are 1 time use and roughly $5-$10 for them. Aswell the history of FFF is stalled by stratasys. They copy righted 3d printing in the late 80's and actively striked down competitors by sueing them or buying them out. Until early 2000 where there patent started to ware out and the reprap movement took place.

I will never buy a stratasys

[–] RubberElectrons 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Word, Stratotrash sucks butt. I just scraped the prints off that dumbass plate repeatedly. Plastic bed in a $40k printer, what a fuckin joke.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)