this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
270 points (95.6% liked)

politics

19098 readers
3231 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Yeah, both sides amiright?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] billiam0202 43 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

Yeah, no.

After months of alleged "Genocide Joe" bullshit, they don't get to shirk themselves of this.

They were told this was going to happen. They didn't want to listen.

[–] kreskin 1 points 10 minutes ago* (last edited 3 minutes ago)

Yeah, no. After months of alleged “Genocide Joe” bullshit, they don’t get to shirk themselves of this.

I see, so you are going to let them have it by whining and nagging on anonymous forums? Is that how you will keep them from "shirking"?

[–] whostosay 16 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

But hey, they've gone from not complicit, to extremely complicit.

[–] kreskin 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Your statement that we were not complicit before is just plain old lies.

[–] whostosay 3 points 4 hours ago

I think you have the wrong we in that case

[–] distantsounds -1 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Nothing alleged about Genocide Joe.

Any vote for Harris or trump was still a vote for the war crimes to continue. The American people never had a say on this issue.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 57 minutes ago

There are differences in degree between Trump and the Democrats, and anyone who claims otherwise is malicious or ignorant. But stick to your binary thinking and reflect on what you've done to the rest of us by putting Trump back into power.

[–] billiam0202 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

And yet, this very article we're commenting on is about war crimes getting worse.

Almost like when your options are "bad" or "worse" you shouldn't vote for "worse."

[–] distantsounds -4 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

That sounds like some extortion. Not exactly something I would want to champion or believe to be a viable political platform

[–] [email protected] 0 points 56 minutes ago

That sounds like some extortion.

Life gives us hard choices. Whining that they don't perfectly suit your pristine moral absolutism doesn't change that.

[–] billiam0202 2 points 7 hours ago

Blinks

That... is nothing the fuck like extortion.

"Vote for me or I'll release these pictures of you fucking your dog" is extortion.

"Vote for me because my opponent will make this issue you claim to care about worse" is not.