this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2024
259 points (72.4% liked)

politics

19144 readers
3414 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Kamala Harris’s political skills have transformed a potentially disastrous 2024 presidential election into a competitive race.

Despite initial skepticism and a challenging campaign, Harris has improved her public image and closed the gap with Trump on key issues. Since Biden stepped aside in July and endorsed her, she has shifted from an unpopular vice president to a viable candidate, even matching Trump in polls on economic issues.

Her leadership has given Democrats a chance to prevent a Trump landslide and halt the rise of American authoritarianism.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 306 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

It's not a testament to her abilities, it's a depressing statement about the state of America that a convicted felon, rapist, fascist loudman can be neck and neck with probably one of the smartest, most highly accomplished presidential candidates we've had in quite a while

[–] spankmonkey 83 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I blame stupid voters AND Republicans trying to pull of a coup through voter suppression.

Up next, endless court cases in an attempt to get SCOTUS to hand over the election to Trump.

[–] acosmichippo 63 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I blame Fox News the most for decades of right wing propaganda.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 weeks ago

Rupert Murdoch and the cabal

[–] Viking_Hippie 8 points 3 weeks ago

And Newt Gingrich

[–] simplejack 24 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I blame years of powerful people trying to ensure that people are not educated and are fed a diet of misinformation with a consistent narrative.

[–] spankmonkey 8 points 3 weeks ago

That is part of Republican voter suppression.

[–] givesomefucks 28 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Yep, the truth is it shouldn't even be this close, but Kamala has moved significantly right in the last four years.

The Dem party doesn't try to get landslide victories, they want to give voters the absolute minimum they need to win. It's the only explanation for why they keep moving right after Obama's 08 landslide

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

Yep, the truth is it shouldn’t even be this close, but Kamala has moved significantly right in the last four years.

Actually, that's probably why she's winning. Because of the nature and makeup of the Electoral College, we can consider the Presidential election biased in favor of the GOP candidate.

It’s the only explanation for why they keep moving right after Obama’s 08 landslide

I've explained this in detail before, so rather than reposting, I'll just point folks over to this, https://lemmy.world/comment/12409521

The Dem party doesn’t try to get landslide victories, they want to give voters the absolute minimum they need to win.

Well, I'm sure they would if they could. But see above - it's not possible with the current structure. I'm still hopeful that we can get Harris elected, and then have a chance of getting the 127 DC states plan to pass - https://www.vox.com/2020/1/14/21063591/modest-proposal-to-save-american-democracy-pack-the-union-harvard-law-review

Which would allow Dems to pass the required constitutional amendments to address the systemic problems with the current, erm, system.