this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2024
686 points (98.0% liked)

politics

19133 readers
2628 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 163 points 1 month ago (4 children)

how is this not on the front page of every news source?!

[–] themeatbridge 123 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

Because Trump is firehosing. There's too much bullshit and fascism, and it would consume any media outlet that reports on it, making the news media appear to be biased.

Look at the complaints from the debate, "Oh wahh, they fact-checked me but didn't fact-check Harris!" and now CBS is saying they won't fact-check the VP debate. They keep doing it because it works.

Trump is floundering. His poll numbers aren't looking great, and his VP keeps fucking up campaign events, people are leaving his rallys on camera behind him, so Trump is just going to shout whatever bombastic bullshit comes to mind in the hopes that it will drown out the other stories. And it fucking works.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 month ago

... people are leaving his rallys on camera behind him, ...

Of note, those people who sit right behind the speaker and get to be on camera - those people are specifically selected to be there.

Even the people who have been chosen to be Trump's backdrop are leaving early.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

His poll numbers aren’t looking great,

They're not looking anywhere near as bad as they should. 44% for Trump and 48% for Harris doesn't mean much when the states' election infrastructure has been systematically compromised by Republicans and the election all depends on a few swing states. There's still a good chance of Trump being the next President.

[–] themeatbridge 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I agree with that. People need to vote like democracy is at stake.

[–] capital_sniff 4 points 1 month ago

What tiny bit of democracy that we are allowed is totes at stake. Trump's administration is talking about regressing us back centuries in this country. Like corporate towns and child labor back. And all because some brain rotted morons are mad eggs got more expensive. Well it just makes me sad, cause they have no idea how bad shit can get for the common citizen.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

“Oh wahh, they fact-checked me but didn’t fact-check Harris!” and now CBS is saying they won’t fact-check the VP debate.

And if there weren't already enough examples that our media are complicit in this clownshow, this puts it over the top for sure.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Wouldn't say it totally works. Yeah some people vote for him but he's literally only losing ground, Trump hasn't actually made any political gain since his initial election, maybe Jan 6th and maybe getting shot at.

But other than that, he really only loses support at least from what I see in my swing state.

[–] jaybone 5 points 1 month ago

I hope you’re right.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Like so much Trump says and does, it's Republicans demanding a state of affairs that already exists, but that we're socially ashamed of.

Ask the guy in the NYC subway who caught a bullet for being adjacent to a turnstile jumper if we have violent policing. Ask George Floyd. Ask Sandra Bland. Ask Rodney King.

It already exists. We already functionally endorse it. We already put these acts is brutality on the front page.

We just don't feel good when we see it. That's what Trump wants to change. He wants us to view domestic police brutality like Israelis treat genocide in Gaza and Lebanon. He wants us to clap.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I've got a buddy who had the shit beaten out of him by Austin PD back in the '90s. He's A REALLY big white guy and the police cited his size as the reason they felt threatened by him.

He fortunately won his lawsuit when he was able to provide evidence that the police beat him up because it seemed like a fun challenge to take down someone so large.

Trump's call for violence is one that cops nationwide will gladly answer

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Trump’s call for violence is one that cops nationwide will gladly answer

Yup.

Protests about police brutality are met with wave of police brutality across US

[–] PostaL 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So what if it were on the first page? Do you think that republicans who know how to read would care?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

It was the Republican who knows how to Read's idea in the first place!

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres 9 points 1 month ago

Because they want Trump to win.