this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2024
202 points (94.7% liked)

World News

39146 readers
3705 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Russia will make changes to its doctrine on the use of nuclear weapons in response to what it regards as Western escalation in the war in Ukraine, state media quoted Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov as saying on Sunday.

The existing nuclear doctrine, set out in a decree by President Vladimir Putin in 2020, says Russia may use nuclear weapons in the event of a nuclear attack by an enemy or a conventional attack that threatens the existence of the state.

Some hawks among Russia's military analysts have urged Putin to lower the threshold for nuclear use in order to "sober up" Russia's enemies in the West.

MBFC
Archive

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lost_My_Mind 95 points 2 months ago (7 children)

The SECOND Russia uses nukes, it's OVER. Russia's entire existence ceases to exist, as EVERY country will nuke Russia. It won't be WWIII.

WWIII would imply two set of countries of roughly equal might, and each side has several countries fighting together.

This would be more like EVERYBODY vs Russia. And they wouldn't last more than a few days.

[–] [email protected] 66 points 2 months ago (5 children)

The problem is Russia has the very real capability of really screwing up a good chunk of the world before they get wiped off the map. It's kind of scary if im being honest.

[–] [email protected] 57 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I would have believed you a few years ago.

At this point I think Putin has to have serious doubts that he could use a nuke and have it actually work. He's up against both western tech and his own corruption.

[–] Cosmonauticus 11 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Yeah the problem is he only needs one to work. Even if it's a dud Russia being nuked into oblivion will have long term ramifications for the entire globe

[–] AngryCommieKender 5 points 2 months ago

We don't have to Nuke Moscow, to effectively nuke Moscow. We invented the MOAB just to be able to do that. They have to rely on the dirty version.

[–] Breezy 3 points 2 months ago

Yeah but it might humble the rest of the world a bit. No one will want to be next.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Do they really?

They made a lot of claims about their military capabilities. However their war with Ukraine has shown those to largely be lies propped up to hide that their oligarchs have emezzled the money.

I'm starting to wonder how nuclear capable they actually are these days.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

Of all the things Russia has spent money on, I have no doubts they have kept most of their nuclear arsenal in working condition. Even if they spent $0 on their military they would find a way to keep the nukes in working order.

[–] cynar 20 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Nukes and ICBMs are extremely complex devices. They also require extremely specialist servi e work to remain functional. Even worse, the only people who can actually check that work are the ones doing it.

Russia hasn't detonated a nuke in decades. I wouldn't be surprised if most of their arsenal are now duds. The money embezzled, while boxes were ticked. Similarly, I wouldn't be surprised if many of their ICBMs just wouldn't launch.

Russia's nuclear capabilities are likely a paper tiger, and Putin likely knows this. Until they try and use them, they are scary. If they try and they fail, they are in a VERY bad situation.

Putin is many things, but he's not stupid. It would take a LOT more pressure from nato for him to even consider using nukes.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

It's kind of funny to me that a significant reason Russia is in its current predicament is because of rampant corruption. Putin runs the country like a Mafia state and then gets all surprised Pikachu Face when it becomes apparent that his underlings just stole all the money instead of using it to maintain their weapons stockpile, which is now aging and dilapidated.

[–] captainlezbian 1 points 2 months ago

Yeah, he knows we’re doubting his capacity and isn’t doing underground detonations

[–] InverseParallax 8 points 2 months ago

Uhh, maybe 2 decades ago, they sold all those weapons on Wish.com, where do you think all those super-yachts came from?

[–] partial_accumen 39 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I think even China and India would sever any remaining ties to russia if russia uses a nuke.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They would, as Russia is only a useful idiot and a link to natural resources for both of those countries.

[–] orclev 19 points 2 months ago (3 children)

China would just wait until it's over and then pick through the remains of Russia. Probably try to claim a big chunk of southern Russia using some excuse or another.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

Well it's not ~~southern Russia's~~ northern China's fault that some mad man in Moscow used a nuke. China will just be generous and help lead the clean up in wonderful north north China.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Ehh. They'd make a beeline for every natural resource bearing region inside Russia's borders. The whole south-western Russian region will turn into a clusterfuck free for all that I doubt they'd want to get involved with, but any mining and oil/gas centers east of the Urals will be priority one.

Empty land is not terribly useful for China right now, although large portions of siberia will likely become arable in the next 50 years. but the dragon is always hungry.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

China would be dealing with nuclear radiation fallout across much of its country.

[–] Nutteman 3 points 2 months ago

Unless they are dropping ground detonations there wouldn't me much. Most nuclear detonation would be airbursts because it's more destructive than a ground blast. Ground blasts cause major fallout.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago

If Russia uses their nukes, about 30 minuites later there won't be a Russia left to sever ties with.

[–] riodoro1 31 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Nato will write a sternly worded letter. Biden will SLAM putin for it. The EU will try to pass chat control.

[–] whostosay 15 points 2 months ago

I don't think that everyone is ready to cry right after reading this comment. Pls delete

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago

Ironically Biden was the one who knew Russia would attack Ukraine and spent MONTHS preparing Ukraine for it, which is why it wasn’t over in 3 days. We have also prepped for nuclear escalation. This is what real leaders do. Trump would just continue to give Putin a blow job.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago (2 children)

it would be over for everyone

[–] BetaBlake 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I better start eating people now so I can be a good cannibal in the wastelands

[–] Sarie 9 points 2 months ago

Beware of microplastics.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Way ahead of you

[–] lepinkainen 9 points 2 months ago

We don’t need to nuke them even, we can just use conventional munitions to fuck up every military installation they have to rubble.

And chuck a few Tomahawks at Kremlin to be sure

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Unless the nuclear fallout is proven to effect a NATO ally and trigger Article 5, no one would give a shit if Russia nuked itself on its own territory. And no one other than the US can afford to unleash all of their their nuclear arsenal, costing billions of dollars and their only defense deterrence, in one go to light the powder keg and be left without nukes to defend themselves.

However, you are correct, Russia would cease to exist if they retaliated disproportionately and a single molecule of NATO territory was effected as a result.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

if Russia nuked itself on its own territory.

The fact that it's Russia substantially increases this possibility.

[–] HomerianSymphony 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

This would be more like EVERYBODY vs Russia.

I do not share your confidence about that.

Countries with nuclear weapons include China, India, Pakistan, North Korea, and possibly Iran. And while I don't think any of them want a nuclear war, if a nuclear war breaks out, I can imagine three or four of them siding with Russia.

China might side with Russia simply because they're sick of the US trying to hem them in militarily through the "island chain" strategy. The US has the entire coast of China surrounded by military bases, which could be used to cut off China's trade routes, which is an existential threat to China because their economy is so dependent on exports.

North Korea has a historical beef with the US, and Russia helped North Korea survive through a period when the US tried to starve them.

India and Pakistan have a long-running dispute over Kashmir, and if India backs the US, it's possibly Pakistan will back Russia just to oppose India.

And Russia and Iran have been solid military and economic allies for a while now, working together in recent conflicts in Syria and Iraq.

[–] whostosay 9 points 2 months ago

If their intelligence agencies are worth anything, they would understand that any action unless directly against Russia would be suicide not only for them but also us. Nukes are a losing strategy no matter what.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Nuclear politics trump geopolitics.

https://youtu.be/v4mZPc_kkys

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

The US has the entire coast of China surrounded by military bases, which could be used to cut of China's trade routes, which is an existential threat to China because their economy is so dependent on exports.

What is it with you people?!?!

"it's not fair that the US DARES to talk to other countries anywhere near us!?!?"

This is the exact same excuse putin used for invading Ukraine, because no country is allowed to make their own decisions on who they talk to unless Russia and China get a veto.

We have power they cannot begin to comprehend, they need to learn a lesson from Putin, "Don't start nothin, won't be nothin", because if there's one thing the US is famous for, it's ending wars definitively.

[–] HomerianSymphony 0 points 2 months ago

"it's not fair that the US DARES to talk to other countries anywhere near us!?!?"

I don't believe that's what I said.