this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2024
473 points (98.2% liked)

Ask Lemmy

27066 readers
3375 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected]


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

For me, it may be that the toilet paper roll needs to have the open end away from the wall. I don't want to reach under the roll to take a piece! That's ludicrous!

That or my recent addiction to correcting people when they use "less" when they should use "fewer"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] affiliate 32 points 3 months ago (5 children)

a couple always means two.

every time anyone says “a couple”, i ask them if they mean two. it’s not pleasant exchange for either of us, but it must be done

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

It's interesting because this also happens in other languages. In Dutch we only use couple (koppel) for people in a relationship.

If you are talking about other things we use "pair" if you have two. But over time people also started using pair wrong, so someone saying "ik heb een paar knikkers" I have a pair of marbles, can still mean he has 5 marbles.

In practice people usually just say I have two marbles when they mean exactly 2.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

Funny that knikkers are marbles! Probably used to be the same in English with een paar, but with language change moving English away from its West Germanic roots we tend not to use 'pair' so often any more except when referring to specific things where it's important that there's two of them, like aces or... knickers.

[–] RememberTheApollo_ 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Couple -2

Few - 3 or more

Lot - anybody’s guess

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

There's a word for if you mean exactly two: two.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Oh, this sparked my hill to die on - two (2). Why the fuck do you need to put it into Hindu-Arabic numeral form (parenthetically, and condescendingly) when you've already given the word in text, which is otherwise in English and it can be assumed that most English-speakers know the word two?!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

There are multiple words that describe numbers.

Couple, pair, and two are all words that describe the number 2.

[–] Eiri 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Disagree. I've always understood it to mean approximately two. Usually 2-3; 4 isn't outlandish.

Unless that's the meaning, the expression doesn't have a reason to exist. So that's how I decide to interpret it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Wrong. A couple is two exactly. After the wedding: Oh look at the happy couple. There aren't 3 or 4 people standing there, 2 people are standing there. A couple.

To couple train carriages together means to attach two carriages together. There are more carriages behind that one, but they were all individually coupled together.

[–] Eiri 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Aw come on, those are two very different meanings of the word in my book. As it happens, the couple of eggs I took out of the fridge aren't in a romantic relationship.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Look in any English language dictionary. Show me an entry that states a couple is more than two

I‘ll wait.

[–] Eiri 2 points 3 months ago

https://www.merriam-webster.com/grammar/couple-few-several-use

Couple is used to refer to two things, but is also often used for a small number greater than two.

by the 1500s, it was also being used in the phrase a couple of to refer to an indefinite but still small number of people or things

Verdict: couple is used of small numbers most of the time, but usually at least two or more.

So yeah, the meaning of "at least two but possibly a bit more than that" has been around for a loooooong time.

[–] fross 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Starting a post with "Wrong." and listing a few items that support your view is... Well it gives me Reddit energy, not a good thing. ;)

Here are some counterexamples that negate it: "I'll be ready in a couple of minutes", "it's a couple of miles away".

This does not always mean exactly two. I mean, if you just want to yell out "it always means exactly two!" Then that's on you, but in the English language everyone else in the world uses, it often means two, but can also mean around but not exactly two, depending on the use case.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

Look in any English language dictionary. Show me an entry that states a couple is more than two.

I‘ll wait.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

True. Otherwise we'd have no use for that stupid word 'throuple'. We should call them fews.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The word you're thinking of is "several".

[–] Eiri 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Looks like there are conflicting definitions. From https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/several

a : more than one

several pleas

b : more than two but fewer than many

moved several inches

So maybe it's what you mean lol

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

You're right but also it's weird that we have a common phrase that means "exactly two" when we could just say "two". I think about that sometimes.

[–] Nibodhika 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It gets weirder because you can also say "a pair". And it gets even weirder because "a pair" means "2 that are meant to be together" whereas "a couple" means two that were put together, which is why it sounds weird to say you got a "couple of socks" (most people would understand this as 4 socks) instead of a "pair of socks".

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

I'd understand it as two mismatched socks.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Why is it weird?

You could just say 'two weeks', but you could also say 'a fortnight'.

Come to think of it, you could even say 'a couple of weeks'