this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2024
793 points (98.4% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26951 readers
5005 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!

Rules:

1. Be Respectful

Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...

2. No Illegal Content

Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...

3. No Spam

Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...

4. No Porn/ExplicitContent

-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...

5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts

-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...

6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.

Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)

Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
STRIKINGdebate2
LillianVS
WiildFiire
Decoy321
Thekingoflorda
YoBuckStopsHere
[email protected]
FlyingSquid
The_Picard_Maneuver
793
I've heard it clears up again after the first wave of divorces (lemmy.world)
submitted 3 months ago by merari42 to c/lemmyshitpost
174 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] peopleproblems 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Not necessarily. If she was an anxious attached style she'd be more likely to fall for avoidant men. She could either:

  1. Now recognize the red flags of avoidants and not subject herself to that.
  2. Be unaware of the red flags of avoidants and keep making the same mistake
  3. Recently left a long term relationship as an secure individual and discover how many avoidants really exist.

Of course you are right, she could be avoidant to, in which case hopefully she'll learn sooner rather than later that fearing intimacy and vulnerability is detrimental, and that healthy codependency is actually a thing. But it's not easy for them to do so.

I don't like to think that everyone is incapable of finding someone, people just need to figure out why. Pointing out "single for a reason" seems counterproductive and a bit disrespectful.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

I think “single for a reason” is what all that attachment theory shit is trying to help contextualize. It specifically sets the context as “single for a fixable reason” if you have the courage and humility to do the work.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Is living in the forest because I'm afraid of the federal government a "fixable" reason?

[–] Entropywins 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's just being awesome...

[–] peopleproblems 1 points 3 months ago

I suppose I didn't consider the act of an anxious attached falling for the avoidant attached as that "reason" I sort of chalked that up to luck.

But your right, anxious attachment tends to end up with avoidant and the anxious attachment needs to learn how to desensitize to intense passion often given by avoidants.

The anxious attached individual has a lot of work to do in regards to understanding their personal value rather than their value to others, where the avoidant has immense work to do on the value of others and the value of themselves.

[–] Cypher 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Sorry you’re so incurably single you’ve latched onto dating advice thats as accurate as horoscopes.

Like I hope it gets better for you but… yikes.

[–] peopleproblems 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's not dating advice, it's attachment theory.

[–] Cypher -3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So stop treating it like dating advice you weirdo.

[–] peopleproblems 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Ok, I'm confused - can you quote the lines that werr dating advice? In no case was I advising anyone do anything, I was sharing the information I have learned on attachment theory. Providing possible insight. That's not advice, that's processing thought.

[–] Cypher -3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Not necessarily. If she was an anxious gemini she’d be more likely to fall for leo men. She could either:

  1. Now recognize the red flags of scorpio and not subject herself to that.
  2. Be unaware of the red flags of cancer and keep making the same mistake
  3. Recently left a long term relationship as an secure individual and discover how many gemini really exist.

Of course you are right, she could be gemni, in which case hopefully she’ll learn sooner rather than later that fearing intimacy and vulnerability is detrimental, and that healthy codependency is actually a thing. But it’s not easy for them to do so.

I don’t like to think that everyone is incapable of finding someone, people just need to figure out why. Pointing out “single for a reason” seems counterproductive and a bit disrespectful.

[–] peopleproblems 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

All you did was substitute the attachment titles for astrology signs.

Attachment theory has a long history of study in psychology, and astrology is just bullshit.

[–] Cypher 0 points 2 months ago

https://www.abc.net.au/news/health/2024-09-01/attachment-styles-relationships-social-media-tik-tok-instagram/104279024

But the idea, for example, that your relationship is doomed if you're with an insecure person is "nonsense," Professor Karantzas says.

"I flatly refute that, that is idiocy at its finest.

[–] Cypher -1 points 3 months ago

And you don't realise that you're applying it in an armchair psychologist fashion that has as much value as astrology?

Reason is lost on some people.