this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2024
352 points (97.6% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26949 readers
4179 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 82 points 3 months ago (8 children)

What first party solved the issue with PayPal? I literally want to see it burn but I don't have an alternative.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (5 children)

I don't understand the PayPal one either.

Who is the 'first party' in this case? The banking system as a whole?

If it's the whole banking system then I'm not sure how that's solved, because as I understand in the US it's still not easy to send money to another private individual via the banking system. And there are Venmo and cashapp and such now but they are just other third parties.

Meanwhile in the UK here it has been possible for decades to send money between bank accounts directly, and free. I still use PayPal though, because my use for it isn't sending money to individuals, it's being able to buy things online without creating an account and without giving my card details.

Maybe people are thinking in phone terms, and the first party is "Apple" or "Google" and the solution is Apple Pay or Google Wallet?

[–] renzev 34 points 3 months ago (6 children)

Thank you for providing a different point of view, I didn't realize things were so complicated in the united states. In the EU there is a system called iDEAL which iirc is maintained by a collaboration of different banks and lets you pay for stuff online instantly and with zero fee. For sending money person-to-person, there are apps like tikkie that are just a thin wrapper around iDEAL. And in cases where these things don't work, you can just do a direct bank transfer by typing in the other person's IBAN in your bank's app/website. Slightly less convenient, but still nearly instant and zero fee.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Never heard of iDEAL. Wikipedia says its a a Dutch system that was acquired by the "European payments initiative" last year. The EPI just became active as a payment system 1 month ago.

This is VERY much still in development and not at all an established system in the EU.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

Not sure about the name of the systems, and I've seen them change names a lot over the years

But I think it's a pretty universal thing in the EU, that you're able to pay directly using an IBAN, I've even seen "direct bank tranfer" in stores that sell across the EU

[–] orl0pl 2 points 3 months ago

In Poland we have BLIK. It's simple, you go to your bank app and generate code, then you write that code and money is transferred. Also you can send money to phone number. That's very great system, with no fees.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 months ago

As a german I've never heard about iDEAL. The Wikipedia article says that it is mainly used in the netherlands

[–] Redredme 9 points 3 months ago

Ideal is not the same, by any means, as PayPal. Read up.

With ideal you loose your money. Ideal is made from the pov of the bank and the shop selling you stuff. Its almost impossible to claim your money back without the sellers consent.

Tikkie is not the same as PayPal since tikkie only works with EU banks. (and quite possibly at this moment only NL banks) PayPal does not need a bank account. Its also not really a wrapper around ideal but thats another discussion. And mostly a semantic one so lets not go there.

Effe wat meer moeite doen en de kleine lettertjes lezen medenedelander :)

[–] plunged_ewe 3 points 3 months ago

Actually, there's a better one for Europe. The Payment Services Directive 2 (PSD2) is an EU directive to allow payments to be done through APIs exposed by the bank. It's essentially a wrapper for a bank transfer. Most new payments companies are just unifying these APIs.

Some counties do it better than others. The UK is very good (with the exception of starling bank). I remember Hungary being a pain.

[–] Lemzlez 2 points 3 months ago

iDEAL sounds a lot like Bancontact/Payconic in Belgium.

Which doesn’t do everything Paypal does either. Others have mentioned the buyer protection, but there’s also multiple payment methods you can link to it, subscription management, and one-click payments (where it also enters your address for shipping) - and crucially: available worldwide.

[–] ProjectPatatoe -4 points 3 months ago

Just another US "first world country" exceptions lol

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I think it’s that PayPal was one of the firsts to provide a method for collecting credit card transactions electronically.

Before PayPal, you’d often have to visit a website, then call the phone number for the seller to collect payment.

eBay needed paypal because their sellers were often not businesses, just people yardsaling stuff online.

Coincidentally, I interned at a PayPal competitor in 1998 that went under during the bust. We had an electronic interface through MS access, but it was a still a human entering in the CC number into one of those dial pads on our side and then confirming the transaction. I’m sure with all of the concerns around security nowadays that you can understand why that was a terrible long term business model.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Thanks for the context. Here in the UK I never experienced a website that didn't take payment via credit card directly as a first option - that's always been there default, with some sites offering PayPal as a second or third way to pay.

And about punching the numbers manually then well, sometimes a bit of Mechanical Turk works just fine lol! :)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

I deal with websites today that are optimized for PayPal first with worse second and third options.

A lot of websites with third party vendors rely on PayPal since it is the cheapest account for a seller with international access and PayPal handles the fraud investigation.

[–] HootinNHollerin 1 points 3 months ago

I don’t think you’re thinking of the same time frame though

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

Canada has Interac, Europe has another standard, the US has another standard... I wish they would all just get together and have a single way to do it that works everywhere in the world...

In the meantime: https://www.paypal.com/ca/webapps/mpp/country-worldwide

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

in the US it's still not easy to send money to another private individual via the banking system

Bizarre

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

In Poland for online payments everyone uses Blik. It lets you generate six digit number in your banking app that you then give to the site you're making payment to. Your banking app then asks you if you want to make the payment with information about how much you pay and to whom. You accept and you're done, no card details were shared.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

In the EU we have SEPA instant transfers

For a global solution you'd want Wise or Revolut or something. Or PayPal, but the others have features PayPal doesn't. But there are instances where PayPal wins.

But all the different banking systems are still a mess sadly.

[–] NickwithaC 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Given that banks' whole thing is transferring money you'd think they'd have got that sorted from the start but no.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

My hypothesis on this is they just don’t want to facilitate moving money out of their bank to another one. Moving money between accounts held by the same bank is usually much easier. The major US banks are for-profit businesses, after all.

Alternative hypothesis - US banks aren’t implementing new features because they’re mostly all still running on ancient IBM mainframes.

[–] Cryophilia 6 points 3 months ago

I've heard from people in banking and in health care that regulations around transferring money and health information have not at all caught up to modern technology in the US. They're tedious and cumbersome, which means thing more more slowly and more haphazardly.

[–] Euphorazine 3 points 3 months ago

My guess is no one is willing to take on the liability. Any new system that introduces bugs or introduces attack vectors from hackers don't want to be responsible for any lost money and I'm sure banks/insurance don't want to take on the risk either.

Magnetic tape and clearing houses for the indefinite future!

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 months ago

Yea, this isn't US focused. A person working here from the UK told me "They tell us when we go over to expect a nice modern society with a third-world banking system. Oh, and guns."

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's just a different third party, though.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

No? Is it? Isn't Zelle just like a directory?

Either way it's owned by the banks. It is the first party solution.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Then I think I was wrong, and you are right.

As someone not from the US I knew of zelle but never used it, and believed it was a direct competitor to Venmo or PayPal.

The reason I thought it was its own thing was because it has its own app, and a catchy silicon-valley-startup type name, and a brand logo, and all of that.

Contrast that to the UK where the ability to send free person-to-person payments has been integrated directly into the banking system for decades, and does not have it's own brand, or app or anything.

[–] Soulfulginger 4 points 3 months ago

Zelle actually got rid of its app and is now incorporated directly in the banking apps themselves. It's kind of like a browser extension where it has its own section in the banking app

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

I don't know for sure. But I do know that Zelle is the banks' collective response to venmo.

[–] UxyIVrljPeRl 2 points 3 months ago

Me too, me too pall.

[–] lama 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm guessing they're referring to FedNow, which is supposed to be like zelle/venmo but backed by the fed.

That being said it's only starting to get rolled out and I have yet to see anyone else whose bank offers it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

US only, that's why PayPal won't stop existing

[–] renzev 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

What first party solved the issue with PayPal?

iDEAL solved it for countries that participate. For countries that don't, sadly there's no good first party solution. Revolut and Transferwise are much better alternatives to paypal tho.

[–] TheBat 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

India also has very good and robust online payment infrastructure.

It's actually mind-boggling that USA hasn't figures that one out, despite being saviour of capitalism.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

We have Zelle, but no one uses it.

[–] Cryophilia 2 points 3 months ago

In my case and some others, it's because zelle has a hair-trigger fraud detection algorithm that has frequent false positives that cause huge headaches. It could be excellent but it's just okay. No one trusts it with substantial sums of money.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Like you said in your initial comment,

International money transfer (with currency exchange) But also I don't want to give some random website my credit card