Or it could just be a nice fringe benefit. It doesn't have to fully charge your car, just a little trickle charge, enough to cover the trip there perhaps. I feel like it's be enough output to at least do that much, combined with being a shaded spot.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Throwing up some canvas shades is a hell of a lot cheaper than adding big integrated solar panels overhead.

I've got an electric plug-in hybrid. Even with a relatively small batter (50 mile range) and an eight hour overnight charge time, I can't bring it up to full. An hour of trickle charging is going to get you a few miles of driving, tops. Idk if the infrastructure investment for all the little charging terminals is going to be worth the return, relative to - say - powering the business itself.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

One way to think of it is that if photovoltaics are cheap and efficient enough to be used in general all over the grid and be worth the investment, then if you’re building a structure with the sole purpose of blocking the sun it may be a good candidate!

Plus since the cost involves a large investment of capital over a long period of time, revenue from the energy generated might make it profitable at the end of her day.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Right, point would be that the energy only funnels into a car when the space is occupied, else it goes into powering the building. Is it fantastical and cost prohibitive right now, sure, but it's an idea that could be implemented when it's less so. These technologies get significantly cheaper over time.