this post was submitted on 17 May 2024
612 points (98.9% liked)

politics

18937 readers
3055 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Do they want Baphomet in their schools? Because this is how you get Baphomet in your schools.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Veedem 57 points 4 months ago (4 children)

There is obviously going to be a lawsuit to stop this if the governor signs off. It seems to fly directly in the face of the constitution.

[–] qantravon 49 points 4 months ago (2 children)

It does fly in the face of the constitution, and multiple SCOTUS' have affirmed exactly that several times.

[–] barsquid 22 points 4 months ago

Aha but this time we will find out which of the plaintiffs or some amicus curiae can afford the better RV.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah but we don’t have a SCOTUS anymore, we have a group of fascist fucks doing what the dollar tells them

[–] psmgx 6 points 4 months ago

It will be overturned after months of totally unnecessary court wrangling.

LA lawmakers will then say "we tried to enact your will, voters, but those godless fat cats in DC wouldn't let us!"

Meanwhile said lawmakers will make no actual attempt to fix the status quo, and the wrangling and debate will ensure entrenched powers stay in power.

[–] AdrianTheFrog 3 points 4 months ago

It clearly does, and allowing this to be enforced clearly breaks precedent, but with how the Supreme Court is now who knows what will happen.

[–] FreakinSteve -3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Actually, it doesnt. The SCOTUS will say that the 1A only limits federal powers, not state.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

man its a good thing the feds can't mandate what the states can do...

[–] FreakinSteve 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Not sure if you're being facetious, but that was the entire point of Dobbes

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

not once has the fed ever said to a state that the state couldn't do anything ever, it's never happened.

Not once. Don't ask texas about secession.

[–] FreakinSteve 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Sounds like you might be entirely ignorant of our current political landscape.

The road to Hell is paved with people saying "stop overreacting!!"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

and the road to fascism is paved with people overreacting. Yeah i've heard it all.

Stop being sensational and we can have a serious discussion about the current political climate.