this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2023
1746 points (97.5% liked)

Political Memes

5612 readers
1392 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RaoulDook 170 points 1 year ago (27 children)
[–] [email protected] 105 points 1 year ago

This is the dumbest comment I've ever seen. We couldn't possibly be daft enough to elect someone that young! And a woman nonetheless!

/s

[–] FlyingSquid 83 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I'd totally vote for Dolly.

[–] blazeknave 36 points 1 year ago (5 children)

If I ever commit voter fraud, it would be to vote Dolly twice :)

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (25 replies)
[–] [email protected] 103 points 1 year ago (24 children)

The people who think Trump should be allowed to run in spite of being an insurrectionist are the same people who support barring other justice-involved people from merely voting in an election

load more comments (24 replies)
[–] negativeyoda 70 points 1 year ago

Fascism, uhhhh... finds a way

[–] MsPenguinette 67 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

People keep saying the GoP will ~~recognize~~ abuse this but they underestimate how little I truly care about politicians. They seem to think everyone cares about politicians as much as they care about Trump. If someone gets disqualified for some minor reason, so what? Seems like a good filter to keep only newer people in the running.

People in politics for decades become corrupt. It happens with power and time. So if they find a way to disqualify Biden, I don’t really care. There’s a hundred million other people who could choose to run. Maybe Greg from down the street might have a shot if politicians who do shit get kicked to the curb when they do shitty shit

[edit] used a wrong word completely. Adding some additional language

[–] macrocephalic 44 points 1 year ago (2 children)

About a decade ago, due to a quirk in our voting system which has been changed, we had a senator elected from a fringe motoring enthusiast party - and he only got a fraction of a percent of the vote. He was actually quite good because he was wise enough to know that he didn't know things, so he sought the opinions of experts, and actually read and tried to understand legislation. Unfortunately he only had a short term, but I always use him as an example of how being a good politician isn't about being the smartest guy, it's just about listening to the experts and trying to represent the best interests of your citizens.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

Much like Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago (4 children)

If someone gets disqualified for some minor reason, so what?

I see the point you're trying to make, but I wouldn't say attempting to overthrow our government to remain in power is a "minor" reason.

[–] Donkter 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think they're saying the people who care about trump think it's too "minor" of a reason to disqualify him and if another candidate was disqualified for what they thought was a minor reason they wouldn't care.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

People keep saying the GoP will recognize this but they underestimate how little I truly care about politicians.

This isn't about you.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's not even so much that they they become corrupt. It's that they become entrenched and as a result they end up wielding power that far exceeds their office. For example, Nancy Pelosi was ludicrously powerful for a mere House member, and Mitch McConnell almost single handedly dictates how half the Senate votes on many issues. A second term for Trump would be the end of America because he controls a huge cult on top of any formal powers he would get from being the President.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] iAvicenna 47 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And we thought by law Erdoğan could not run for presidency again, and yet did (also the first time because of his questionable university diploma but that is a story for another night kids)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 year ago (9 children)

This is the argument that Raphael Cruz was born in Canada and shouldn’t have been a contender for the Republican nomination. I support this logic.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Brunbrun6766 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If my old folks didn't read the Bible that they claim to know so much about, what makes you think they read the Constitution?

[–] themeatbridge 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The good news is, they aren't judges. The bad news is, there are a lot of judges like your old folks.

[–] Brunbrun6766 21 points 1 year ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Omg 35 ????? Thats kinda old

[–] psud 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's the idea. They wanted to ensure the president has a chance to build some wisdom. They didn't want youth in positions of power

[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 year ago

That's how you end up with an ice clown who builds an ice town

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] breakingcups 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is this Dropout.tv's Sam Reich's father?

[–] FlyingSquid 38 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Yes, it is. But more importantly:

Robert Bernard Reich (/raɪʃ/ RYSHE;[2] born June 24, 1946) is an American professor, author, lawyer, and political commentator.[3] He worked in the administrations of Presidents Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter, and served as Secretary of Labor from 1993 to 1997 in the cabinet of President Bill Clinton.[4][5] He was also a member of President Barack Obama's economic transition advisory board.[6]

Reich has been the Chancellor's Professor of Public Policy at the Goldman School of Public Policy at UC Berkeley since January 2006.[7] He was formerly a lecturer at Harvard University's John F. Kennedy School of Government[8] and a professor of social and economic policy at the Heller School for Social Policy and Management of Brandeis University. In 2008, Time magazine named him one of the Ten Best Cabinet Members of the century,[9] and in the same year The Wall Street Journal placed him sixth on its list of Most Influential Business Thinkers.[10]

He has published 18 books which have been translated into 22 languages,[11] including the best-sellers The Work of Nations, Reason, Saving Capitalism, Supercapitalism, Aftershock: The Next Economy and America's Future, and a best-selling e-book, Beyond Outrage. He is also board chair emeritus of Common Cause and writes his own blog about the political economy at Robertreich.org.[12] The Robert Reich–Jacob Kornbluth film Saving Capitalism was selected to be a Netflix Original, and debuted in November 2017, and their film Inequality for All won a U.S. Documentary Special Jury Award for Achievement in Filmmaking at the 2013 Sundance Film Festival in Utah.[13][14]

In 2015, Reich and Kornbluth founded Inequality Media, a nonprofit digital media company.[15] Inequality Media's videos feature Reich discussing topics relating to inequality and power primarily in the United States, including universal basic income, labor rights protection, the racial wealth gap, affordable housing, and gerrymandering.[16]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Reich

In essence, he's definitely someone worth paying attention to.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›