this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2023
508 points (92.8% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

9769 readers
462 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] scottywh 76 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Colorado used to disallow collection of rainwater too because people further down the line supposedly had the rights to that water.

You're now allowed something like 2 - 30 gallon barrels to collect it here now.

[–] RGB3x3 47 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Late stage capitalism: where they decide someone owns the fucking rain.

[–] barfplanet 46 points 1 year ago

Water rights are the opposite of late stage capitalism. It's silly to enforce when we're talking about a residential rain barrel, but when we're talking on much larger scales is critical. When creeks are drying up because landowners are building catchment ponds, water rights start to look pretty good.

[–] Pipoca 38 points 1 year ago (5 children)

It's because Colorado water law is based on 'prior appropriations'.

Colorado was settled around mining and ranching, both of which can be water-intensive. It's also a fairly dry place. Water rights have been serious business for a long time.

So the rule was that the first person there had the right to start using river water for their mine. Then, if a second person starts a mine upstream, they had the right to use river water only inasmuch as it didn't impact the prior downstream mine. If there was a drought, the upstream mine had to use less water so the earlier mine wasn't impacted. Rain barrels were prohibited because that water "belonged" to some downstream rights holder, just as using the water from a stream might be prohibited because it belongs to a downstream rights holder.

This isn't really late-stage capitalism. The law in Colorado goes back to some court cases in the 1870s and 1880s.

[–] c0mbatbag3l 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's unfortunate that you have like four up votes for explaining the actual History behind it but the guy who just thinks it's an issue that popped up ten years ago has dozens.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

I'm not sure how upvotes are relevant here considering the time difference between both comments is about 11 hours.

Also, how much does the ratio of ups and downvotes on a post or comment influences your thought on the subject matter?

[–] givesomefucks 6 points 1 year ago

Yeah, but Colorado isn't a desert where people struggle for clean water in the best of times...

And I'm pretty sure the only thing downstream of Gaza is the ocean

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] scottywh 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well, I mean, it isn't entirely illogical... If I lived somewhere that always got approximately the same amount of water year over year but then suddenly my neighbor started straight up "stealing it all" straight out of the sky I might would be pissed too.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sometimes you have to think about broad impact when developing policy. Sure, laws against rain collection seem draconian on the individual scale, but if a large percentage of the population collected rainwater, reservoirs and water tables can be seriously affected. Not saying this specific Israeli action is justified, but there are valid limitations on water collection put in place to ensure everyone has access.

It would be substantially worse if there were no such limitations in place, and whoever owned the land that drained into communal reservoirs could privately control the water supply of a region.

[–] Noodle07 5 points 1 year ago

It would be substantially worse if there were no such limitations in place, and whoever owned the land that drained into communal reservoirs could privately control the water supply of a region.

It would be fucking Nestlé again

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago (22 children)

It's illegal or highly fined in a lot of other countries as well. (Especially during dry seasons)

[–] Maggoty 30 points 1 year ago (10 children)

In other countries they don't cut you off from water infrastructure either though. Context is important.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
[–] badbytes 24 points 1 year ago

Very little good about Israel these days.

[–] GardenVarietyAnxiety 24 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Fuck the Israeli government 100%, but it's illegal to collect rainwater in certain US cities, too.

[–] Leyla 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But nobody restricts your regular water supply to less than half of what is considered the bare minimum by the UN.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

Well it's not like Mexico is forbidding the US from collecting.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago

Same for a lot of places.

Israel wouldn't bother enforcing it when they can just blow up your house and say you're Hamas.

[–] Num10ck 17 points 1 year ago (4 children)

this is also the law in Los Angeles, for what its worth.

[–] Maggoty 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

In Los Angeles foreigners don't break your access to water infrastructure and call the army on you when you attempt to fix it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

That’s so strange to me. Living in Australia, we face very similar periodic drought conditions that California faces as well. Rather than being discouraged from capturing rainwater to use, we’re actively encouraged to do so, with many governments previously offering subsidies for rainwater tanks particularly during drought times. We have specific colourings for rainwater taps (purple) and you can buy signs to put up in your yard that say that you use rainwater, so people don’t get mad if you’re watering your lawn. These subsidies were usually alongside heavy water restrictions including not being able to water lawns; not watering plants during daylight hours; not using a hose to wash your car (a pressure washer from a bucket is allowed) etc.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is here in Texas too…

[–] carl_dungeon 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The rain in Texas belongs to Israel authorities?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Might as well, they can do no wrong in the eyes of our esteemed leaders…

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

are you fucking kidding me?

[–] peopleproblems 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I hope domestic needs includes drinking.

Please don't drink rain water. It's not safe for human consumption. Plants will be ok, you will not be.

[–] mlg 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I mean... you know we have filtration technology right?

You don't drink raw water out of an unclear well or even clear river either bruh

[–] Agent641 11 points 1 year ago

I slurp it straight out of the gutter, leaves and all.

Cometely unrelated but something is wriggling inside my eyeball.

[–] peopleproblems 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Of course.

How many people in Gaza right now have access to a reverse osmosis filter?

[–] mlg 15 points 1 year ago

Oh in that case I'm sure they would all prefer to die of dehydration instead of drinking slightly contaminated rainwater.

Because it must be equally as bad as all the sewage ground water.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

You can distill water with a hole in the ground, a tarp, a coffee can, and a small stone to hold down the center of the tarp.

You can distill your urine this way if it comes to that.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›