this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2023
149 points (95.7% liked)

News

23535 readers
6548 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Oregon’s first-in-the-nation law that decriminalized the possession of small amounts of heroin, cocaine and other illicit drugs in favor of an emphasis on addiction treatment is facing strong headwinds in the progressive state after an explosion of public drug use fueled by the proliferation of fentanyl and a surge in deaths from opioids, including those of children.

“The inability for people to live their day-to-day life without encountering open-air drug use is so pressing on urban folks’ minds,” said John Horvick, vice president of polling firm DHM Research. “That has very much changed people’s perspective about what they think Measure 110 is.”

When the law was approved by 58% of Oregon voters three years ago, supporters championed Measure 110 as a revolutionary approach that would transform addiction by minimizing penalties for drug use and investing instead in recovery.

But even top Democratic lawmakers who backed the law, which will likely dominate the upcoming legislative session, say they’re now open to revisiting it after the biggest increase in synthetic opioid deaths among states that have reported their numbers.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 108 points 1 year ago (14 children)

And of course nobody even contemplating the idea that they underfunded the resources invested in recovery and that's the change they need to make.

[–] kescusay 52 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oregonian here. And... Yep. That's it exactly.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Second Oregonian here, and also yup. We decriminalized but then decided not to require treatment (Portugal method), and then didn't fund treatment anyway.

[–] TempermentalAnomaly 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Portugal doesn't require treatment. I don't know where this idea came from, but this isn't the first time I've seen this misinformation.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] buffaloboobs 67 points 1 year ago (2 children)

so, Oregon had "the biggest increase in synthetic opioid deaths among states" 😱

"...that have reported their numbers."

I feel like that last phrase is doing a lot of work. I'm not going to put in the work to figure out the numbers, but it's a weird place to end the article.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago

Same with homeless and gun activity. Some states, exclusively red states, don't share their statistics or just don't want to pay to track them.

[–] ZephyrXero 7 points 1 year ago
[–] Candelestine 66 points 1 year ago (12 children)

I mean, if the people are willing to risk their lives with an overdose, I don't think a criminal penalty is going to scare them very much. So, yeah, more resources for treatment are probably necessary.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] alienanimals 63 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's almost as if the half-assed decriminalization effort was not done in earnest because opponents want to see it fail. We have cops not doing their jobs, government officials not emulating existing models (like Portugal), and recovery clinics that will turn you away if you haven't been doing the "right" opiates.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Seriously. We have models that are proven to work. Just fucking emulate them.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

We've tried nothing and we're all out of ideas!

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's the same dumb approach as it is with the "housing first" model. Yes this models work and they work great!

But you actually have to read more than just the headline of the paper. The decriminalisation of drugs in Portugal for example came with a whole bunch of other new regulations and programs. It wasn't "just" decriminalise drugs and be done with it.

We are approaching Idiocracy status fast...

[–] Harpsist 2 points 1 year ago

I think we're nose deep in idiocrazy.

[–] Jonna 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are you saying "housing first" works or not?

Because just labeling something "housing first" without actually providing housing of course doesn't work and that may be what you're say. But a proper "housing first" DOES WORK to significantly improve people's lives and reduce their engagement with emergency services (ie, cops and hospitals), which is quality of life for the rest of us.

Here's a study from the Lancet (n=1103): https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5370(22)00117-1/fulltext

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well, did you read the study you posted?

Housing First approach is founded on a rights-based philosophy, which provides clients with immediate access to permanent housing and mental health support services

Upon enrolment, service teams create collaborative housing and care plans and facilitate access to health services and income benefits

For all three of our models, health and social service consultation at enrolment was confirmed to be a significant part of multiple indirect pathways to the 24-month outcomes.

Recovery approaches in mental health programs such as those used in Housing First seek to connect clients to meaningful daily routines around school and greater engagement with family and community.

The Oregon way of doing "Housing First" would be to take the name of the program literally, put people into apartments and expect that now all their problems resolve themselves.

[–] brygphilomena 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's almost as if legalizing the sale of drugs would give a safe place to get drugs that aren't laced with fentanyl.

This helps those with addiction from getting caught up in the prison system, but nothing to make them safer when taking drugs.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Or in some cases you could get Fentanyl but have it correctly labeled, dosed, and administered.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We didn't legalize them, just decriminalized them. Problem is, we didn't follow the Portugal method and require them to get treatment… just not caught up in the system. So of course this was going to happen.

[–] jordanlund 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Making treatment optional (unlike Portugal) has been the big disaster here.

16,000 people ticketed under measure 110, less than 1% actively seeking treatment.

https://www.oregonlive.com/health/2022/09/oregons-drug-decriminalization-effort-sends-less-than-1-of-people-to-treatment.html

Meanwhile, drug use is exploding, overdoses are exploding, related thefts and crime are exploding...

https://oregoncapitalchronicle.com/2022/02/07/oregon-has-worst-drug-addiction-problem-in-the-nation-report-shows/

https://www.kgw.com/article/news/local/the-story/portland-downtown-firefighter-overdose-calls-narcan-deaths/283-a37b7402-c199-40ce-a120-bb6aec149365

"In June alone, firefighters from Station 1 responded to 300 overdoses.

Portland police data shows that back in 2020 nearly 90 people died from overdoses. The number jumped to 135 in 2021, then to 159 in all of 2022. So far this year there have been 151 deaths, all in less than seven months. Police expect that number to be around 300 by year's end."

110 continues to be an utter failure.

[–] ZephyrXero 13 points 1 year ago (4 children)

And yet recent studies show overdoses have not gone up as a result, and Fentanyl is a growing problem in all US cities. https://www.opb.org/article/2023/09/27/oregon-drug-decriminalization-measure-110-overdose-deaths/

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You can't force treatment on someone who doesn't want help and expect results. Just like throwing them in jail until they're sober doesn't stop them from using as soon as they get released.

Not ruining people's lives further with jail and criminal records for personal use is better than what we were doing before, even if it's not perfect.

[–] jordanlund 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Addicts won't volunteer for help, that's part of the addiction.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

We do sometimes. The point is to make sure the help is there if and when we decide to.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Rehab only works if the person wants to get clean. Otherwise it's just incarceration. There needs to be more support for those that want to get clean, but decriminalizing drugs also has to be done so that they can feel safe to seek treatment without fear of punishment.

[–] jordanlund 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We are trying decriminalization, it's not working.

The reason it works in Portugal is a) treatment is not optional and b) Nationalized health care.

Absent those two things, decriminalization is a disaster.

[–] TempermentalAnomaly 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

Treatment isn't mandatory in Portugal. Rather, they expanded treatment services, increased point for positive intervention and interactions with healthcare provider and social workers, and focused on harm reduction.

Learn about the practices and not the misinformation. You can read more in the wikipedia entry under regulations.

[T]he suspect is interviewed by a "Commission for the Dissuasion of Drug Addiction" (Comissões para a Dissuasão da Toxicodependência – CDT). ... The committees have a broad range of sanctions available to them when ruling on the drug use offence. ... The committee cannot mandate compulsory treatment, although its orientation is to induce addicts to enter and remain in treatment.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

In the first year after the law took effect in February 2021, only 1% of people who received citations for possession sought help via the hotline

This tells me the voluntary approach does not work. I'm going to guess those citations do not get paid either.

load more comments
view more: next ›