this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
534 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

55563 readers
4504 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
534
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by ChunkMcHorkle to c/technology
 

Sam Altman has been fired as CEO of OpenAI, the company announced on Friday.

“Mr. Altman’s departure follows a deliberative review process by the board, which concluded that he was not consistently candid in his communications with the board, hindering its ability to exercise its responsibilities,” the company said in its blog post.

EDITED TO ADD direct link to OpenAI board announcement:
https://openai.com/blog/openai-announces-leadership-transition

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nobody 296 points 7 months ago (2 children)

"AI is going to take away jobs."

"Wait... not like that."

[–] [email protected] 44 points 7 months ago

Oops... didnt see that coming

[–] [email protected] 21 points 7 months ago (12 children)

He got billions in his account. I dont think he cares. For them job is something to do to not get bored, I guess?

[–] kromem 22 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Pretty much literally not about the money for him.

He didn't have any equity and didn't get a salary.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] kromem 194 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

I've seen a number of misinformed comments here complaining about a profit oriented board.

It's worth keeping in mind that this board was the original non-profit board, that none of the members have equity, and literally part of the announcement is the board saying that they want to be more aligned as a company with the original charter of helping bring about AI for everyone.

There may be an argument around Altman's oust being related to his being too closed source and profit oriented, but the idea that the reasoning was the other way around is pretty ludicrous.

Again - this isn't an investor board of people who put money into the company and have equity they are trying to protect.

[–] drmoose 17 points 7 months ago (2 children)

So what is their board here if they aren't investors?

[–] kromem 43 points 7 months ago (2 children)

It's a non-profit.

OpenAI is a non-profit with a board which owns the LLC which is what was invested into and makes money.

This was not the LLC board, but the non-profit board in charge of the whole thing.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] xantoxis 16 points 7 months ago

I don't know why you're being downvoted, this is a good question that not everyone knows the answer to. (It's been answered above me, but just so we're clear, any large organization can have a board of directors, whether they invest money or not. A board of directors isn't necessarily "the people who have money", it's the people who set the direction.)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TootSweet 107 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'm more surprised that the folks at OpenAI saw fit to fire him than I am that he committed fireable offenses.

[–] MotoAsh 58 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Because he lied to them instead of for them.

[–] peopleproblems 26 points 7 months ago (1 children)

But what he lied about is probably bigger news.

This has corporate PR speak all over it, but it is clear that it was circumventing the desires of the Board, and the chairman of the Board steps down as well.

The absolute hell happened?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zorlan 87 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The company is now actually being run by ChatGPT, Mira is just the face it's hiding behind.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I asked Bard to give me a generic reason for firing a CEO.

Certainly, here are some vague reasons for firing the CEO of an AI company:
Leadership concerns: The CEO's leadership style or personal conduct was not in line with the company's values or culture. This could include issues such as lack of transparency, poor communication, or ethical breaches.

Yup.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Bard is on copium with that last one.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 37 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I am actually very surprised. Did not see this coming.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tdawg 35 points 7 months ago (3 children)

OpenAI also announced that co-founder Greg Brockman will be stepping down as chairman of the board, though he will remain at the company.

Interesting. No way this isn't connected

[–] ChunkMcHorkle 25 points 7 months ago

Yeah. Given the language (Altman lied to them) and the chairman stepping down (but remaining in the C-suite) I'm starting to think that maybe Altman was trying to take something in an unapproved direction and present it as a fait accompli but got found out before he was ready to reveal it.

I added the direct link to the board's announcement to the post text so people can see it for themselves -- interesting how the board separated Altman's removal from Brockman's demotion by five paragraphs, adding Brockman's changed position just before the end almost as an afterthought. Which of course it isn't, lol.

[–] kromem 12 points 7 months ago

He just resigned like 30m ago.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 7 months ago

He hallucinated to the board.

[–] MargotRobbie 33 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Not exactly surprised here. Every time I've seen him on the news, it's always him fearmongering about the dangers of generative AI, when ChatGPT is burning through money and seemed to become more and more restrictive with every iteration. You can't run an organization if it is built on top of lies.

Actually open models (not open source, sadly) like specialized LLaMa 2 derivatives that could be ran and fine-tuned locally seems to be the future, because there seems to be a diminishing return in training/inference power to usefulness, and specialized smaller model tuned for specific applications are much more flexible than a giant general one that can only be used on somebody else's machine.

[–] kromem 25 points 7 months ago

because there seems to be a diminishing return in training/inference power to usefulness

Be careful not to be caught up in the application of Goodhart's Law going on in the field right now.

There's plenty of things GPT-4 trounces everything else on, they just tend to be things outside the now standardized body of tests, which suggests the tests have become the target and are no longer effective measurements.

This is perhaps most apparent in things like Orca, where we directly use the tests as the target, have GPT-4 generate synthetic data that improves Llama performance on the target, and then see large gains in smaller models on the tests.

But those new models don't necessarily have the same capabilities on more abstract capabilities, such as the recent approach of using analogy to solve problems.

We are arguably becoming too myopic in how we are measuring the success of new models.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Oh no, anyways

This is unprecedented. They let that schmuck at Unity "retire" on a holiday but they fired Sam. Oof.

It sounds like there was a power struggle over the direction of OpenAI.

[–] sugarfree 28 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

This is really big news, going to be interesting if anything leaks or if we stay in the dark. For Altman to be fired and for them to release a statement like this it has to be something drastic.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 7 months ago (4 children)

My guess — and this is pure conjecture — MS canned him because Bing didn't eat Google's lunch.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] jeffw 19 points 7 months ago (1 children)

On one hand, this was posted 15 minutes before you posted this... on the other hand, this is a much clearer headline

[–] ChunkMcHorkle 33 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Really? I searched by new before I posted, saw nothing about Sam Altman.

EDITED TO ADD you can color me blind, because yeah, there's one titled "OpenAI announces leadership transition" right before mine. Shit. Not sure how to handle this, but if the mods want to delete mine they can.

[–] papalonian 48 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Not sure how to handle this,

In times of great dishonor, the Samurai would commit seppuku with their sword.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle 32 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I have half a plastic knife I use on the cat food . . . will that do?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Only if you post the video

[–] ChunkMcHorkle 15 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I think I'm gonna need to upgrade my current drug regimen . . . be right back . . .

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Alternatively, you can do sudoku.

[–] Jerkface 17 points 7 months ago (1 children)

But he still has to do it with the plastic knife.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 7 months ago (2 children)

CEO? Fuck him. He'll be just fine.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Decoy321 13 points 7 months ago (9 children)
[–] ChunkMcHorkle 53 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

No idea, but given how sudden and out-of-the-blue this is, and the fact that he was co-founder of OpenAI (meaning that to some degree the board is pushing him out of his own company) you can make an educated guess that's it's huge.

~~My guess, personally, is financial malfeasance,~~ if only because personal misbehavior usually involves some hemming and hawing before a company concludes that the ejectee "is no longer a good fit and does not represent the values held by our organization." This was very sudden, no one saw it coming, and that's not too usual.

I guess we'll see, lol.

EDITED TO ADD I've changed my mind after a closer look at the wording of the board announcement. Given the language (Altman lied to them) and the chairman stepping down (but remaining in the C-suite) I’m starting to think that maybe Altman was trying to take something in an unapproved direction and present it as a fait accompli but got found out before he was ready to reveal it:

Mr. Altman’s departure follows a deliberative review process by the board, which concluded that he was not consistently candid in his communications with the board, hindering its ability to exercise its responsibilities. (paragraph 3)

As a part of this transition, Greg Brockman will be stepping down as chairman of the board and will remain in his role at the company, reporting to the CEO. (paragraph 6)

[–] kromem 12 points 7 months ago

It's worth keeping in mind the explicit mention of their key responsibility at the end, which was the original non-profit charter of "ensuring that artificial general intelligence benefits all of humanity."

[–] seaQueue 16 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Whatever it was it's spicy enough that they're trying to bury the press release in the late Friday afternoon news graveyard

Edit: even better, whatever they're trying to distance themselves from is so important they didn't even wait for the closing bell on the market.

[–] vxx 11 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

I interpret their wording that he lied to the board repeadetly and made some unethical backdoor deals of evil.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›